Teams

CV-Ringer

2025 CV Masters' 70s League · CV-Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-20vs CV-GiacominiLost 01
L#3 DoublesDonna Simpson / Rebecca Bratlien vs Alethea Platis / Jandi Fraser2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-06vs CV-GiacominiLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn Habeger / Diane Friedman vs Farzaneh Kia / Jennifer Bentley3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-01-30vs LLW-CV-ParkersonWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Habeger / Diane Friedman vs Thelma Sahara / Marjo Hull6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-01-23vs CV-WillseySplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiane Friedman / Ann Habeger vs Dee Strecker / Kerry MacPherson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#4 DoublesDonna Simpson / Rebecca Bratlien vs Marne Albracht / Paula Wells0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-01-16vs LLW-CV-ParkersonWon 10
W#4 DoublesDonna Simpson / Rebecca Bratlien vs Michele Weddle / Lindsay Price6-2, 6-2
2025-01-09vs CV-GiacominiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnn Habeger / Diane Friedman vs Martha Church / Marie Allman6-3, 6-2
L#4 DoublesDonna Simpson / Rebecca Bratlien vs Alethea Platis / Janet Daniel1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Donna Simpson
published
3.56
Ann Habeger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Rebecca Bratlien
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Ann Crampton
published 3.5
Donna Peterson
published
Eileen Clark
published
Jenny Carson
published
Kenzie Thompson
published
Ledean Nilsen
published
Marianne Roth
published
MaryLynn Murphy
published
Monica Sabo
published
Nancy Yazel
published
Nora Vrabek
published
Susan Devereaux
published
Susan Haley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Bratlien + Donna Simpson6070% gamesnot enough data
Jenny Carson + Eileen Clark404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donna Simpson
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
3.5
Ann Habeger
89W–85L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Rebecca Bratlien
35W–68L career · 4 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.40
3.5
Ann Crampton
51W–35L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Donna Peterson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Eileen Clark
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Carson
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kenzie Thompson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ledean Nilsen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marianne Roth
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
MaryLynn Murphy
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Sabo
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Yazel
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nora Vrabek
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Devereaux
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Haley
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.