Teams

Foust/18/CCL

2022 City Championship 18 & Over - Women Day · 3.0 BR (18&O) Women Day

17 players · average NTRP 3.10 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings14 teams · 3.0 BR (18&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Scott/18/BREC82341639356
2Lewis/18/BRCC73302047399
3Foust/18/CCL73272353410
4Skinner/18/BRCC73262455431
5Mannino /18/UClub64292147407
6SEARCY/18 /Bocage64282251424
7Cook/18/BREC54252047389
8Terral/18/BREC55262452396
9LaNasa/18/CCL55252555440
10Powers 18/BREC55262457461
11McCracken/18/BREC46242658455
12DeJean/18/SOAC28203066474
13Harton/ 18 /Bocage18162960446
14Favre/18/BRCC1994183535

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Ellen Pino
published 3.5
3.15
Summer Soileau
published
3.03
Marcy Bernard
published
2.98
Jennifer Mogenson
published
2.97
Michelle Fisher
published
2.85
Anu Mehrotra
published 3
2.85
Candace Mula
published 3
2.79
Terre Smith
published
2.77
Terri Baldwin
published
Bridget Petrie
published 3
2.72
Jennifer Frederick
published
2.66
Laurie Ginn
published
2.54
Theresa Gomez
published
2.53
Stephanie Foust
published
2.51
Jan Chiles
published 3
Julianne Bonnecaze
published
Sherry Melara
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Mogenson + Terre Smith7362% games+4.2% vs expected
Theresa Gomez + Jan Chiles4248% games+2.8% vs expected
Jennifer Frederick + Laurie Ginn2443% games−1.5% vs expected
Summer Soileau + Jennifer Mogenson5261% games−2.2% vs expected
Jan Chiles + Terre Smith4250% games−3.4% vs expected
Theresa Gomez + Jennifer Mogenson224 matchesnot enough data
Marcy Bernard + Summer Soileau404 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Mogenson + Laurie Ginn224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ellen Pino
32W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Summer Soileau
65W–34L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Marcy Bernard
26W–15L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03
Jennifer Mogenson
69W–42L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
2.98
Michelle Fisher
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Anu Mehrotra
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Candace Mula
25W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Terre Smith
46W–41L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
Terri Baldwin
30W–40L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Bridget Petrie
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Frederick
8W–17L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
Laurie Ginn
24W–32L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
Theresa Gomez
20W–22L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
2.54
Stephanie Foust
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Jan Chiles
34W–40L career · type A · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
2.51
Julianne Bonnecaze
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherry Melara
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.