Teams

Albright/ARSC 3.0W Fall Singles Sunday

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 3.0 Women Fall Singles

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-19vs Gonzalez 3.0W Fall Singles SundayLost 12
W#1 SinglesRadha Singh vs Rhonda Wakefield6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLouise Albright vs Clara Gonzalez Flores3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesEmily Owen vs Julia Saguier1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLouise Albright vs Teri Bramsway3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSharlotte Brooks vs Rebecca Morrison7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesKaren Hardesty vs Jamie Cunningham1-6, 2-6
2025-09-21vs Kuebert 3.0W Fall Singles SundayWon 21
L#1 SinglesKaren Hardesty vs Suki Gutierrez6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAlyssa Way vs Graceanne Schuster6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesEmily Owen vs Whitney Kuebert6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSharlotte Brooks vs Sandy Cathers6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLouise Albright vs Sammie Jo McCluskey1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesEmily Owen vs Sarah Lopatka3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-08-24vs Ray 3.0W Fall Singles SundayWon 30
W#1 SinglesRadha Singh vs Kim Edwards7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesEmily Owen vs Angela Duke6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLouise Albright vs Allyson Wood6-4, 7-6
2025-08-17vs Holtzman 3.0W Fall Singles SundayLost 12
L#1 SinglesRadha Singh vs Heidi Boswell7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLouise Albright vs Ariel Holtzman3-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesSharlotte Brooks vs Barbara Robinson6-2, 6-0
2025-08-10vs Gonzalez 3.0W Fall Singles SundayWon 21
W#1 SinglesKaren Hardesty vs Ji Kim3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSharlotte Brooks vs Clara Gonzalez Flores1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesAlyssa Way vs Meredith Vaughn6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Fall Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Radha Singh
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.92
Karen Hardesty
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.88
Sharlotte Brooks
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.82
Alyssa Way
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.57
Emily Owen
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Louise Albright
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Radha Singh + Karen Hardesty123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Radha Singh
30W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Karen Hardesty
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Sharlotte Brooks
25W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Alyssa Way
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Emily Owen
9W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Louise Albright
3W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.