Teams

Swiggett/GR/3.5 tri

2026 TUL TRI-LEVEL 18 & Over League · WOMEN 2.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-12vs Gulledge/IS/tri 3.5 WWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Jokerst / Julie Bunting vs Charity Cherry / Sharla Smith6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmber Jennings / Kristie Kraus vs Kay Gulledge / Cyndi Wilkett6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHannah Irvine / Sarah Isbell vs Brenda Biles / Lori Smith6-0, 6-1
2026-08-06vs Hunt-Wills/TTC/tri 3.5WWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Bunting / Kelsey Robin vs Sarah ODonovan / Meg Grewal6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNicole Swiggett / Cassidy Nelson vs Lauren Hunt / Sheri Engelbrecht6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSandie Barns / Hannah Irvine vs Leigh Birdsong / Krystal Williams6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesLisa Jokerst / Julie Bunting vs Leah Jappe / Lacey Vogts6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Swiggett / Katie Carpenter vs Katy Spangler / Katie Sachse6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHannah Irvine / Sarah Isbell vs Leslie Daugherty / Elizabeth Edwards6-0, 6-0
2026-07-22vs Hill/LF/tri 3.5WWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Jokerst / Kelsey Robin vs Jenine Hembree / Casandra Celestain6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmber Jennings / Katie Carpenter vs Georgette Morris / Sheena Rivers6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSandie Barns / Hannah Irvine vs Tia Hill / Tracy Beswick6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-13vs Carlberg/LF/tri3.5WWon 30
W#1 DoublesBailey Wolff / Lisa Jokerst vs Bernadette Shelley / Raylyn Danker6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristie Kraus / Nicole Swiggett vs Heather Harrod / Amber George6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMelissa Stone / Sarah Isbell vs Ellie Carlberg / Valerie Edgeller6-0, 7-6
2026-07-06vs Gulledge/IS/tri 3.5 WWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Bunting / Erin Rich vs Stephanie Kuykendall / Kristin Mitchell6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCassidy Nelson / Hannah Irvine vs Monica Tunnell / Cyndi Wilkett6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMelissa Stone / Sarah Isbell vs Nancy Park / Joanna Majka6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings24 teams · WOMEN 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Swiggett/GR/3.5 tri60171571
2Labadie/GR/3.5 tri60162791
3Hill/LF/tri 3.5W5113510110
4Kelly/PH/tri 3.5 W5113511126
5Siddal Blue/SH/tri 3.5W5111716148
6Schluter/LF/tri 3.5W4111410104
7Siddal/SH/tri 3.5W3081248
8Kelly Hunt/LF/tri 3.5 W327818145
9Price/LF/tri 3.5W3310819160
10Cole/LF/tri 3.5 W339920161
11Hunt-Wills/TTC/tri 3.5W3381024177
12Sanders/LF/tri 3.5 W227513104
13Foust/LF/tri 3.5W237818135
14Ellsworth/GR/tri 3.5W237818139
15Harrelson/LF/tri 3.5W2471123174
16Lott/FR/tri3.5W2461224171
17Gulledge/IS/tri 3.5 W2461226168
18Tjeerdsma/LF 3.5 tri W2461229197
19Nunley/IS/tri 3.5W133918121
20Stover/LF/tri 3.5W146918133
21Rainbow Warriors/Maguire/LF tri 3.5W1571125173
22Grimes/LF/tri 3.5W1561226183
23Jmaeff/LF/tri 3.5W1541430194
24Carlberg/LF/tri3.5W1531532196

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Julie Bunting
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Bailey Wolff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Lisa Jokerst
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Kelsey Robin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Katie Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.81
Kristie Kraus
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.78
Erin Rich
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.66
Nicole Swiggett
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Cassidy Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Sandie Barns
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Hannah Irvine
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.34
Sarah Isbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Taylor Brisebois
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelsey Robin + Lisa Jokerst14066% games+16.1% vs expected
Sandie Barns + Sarah Isbell3350% games+5.9% vs expected
Nicole Swiggett + Kristie Kraus314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Bunting + Lisa Jokerst404 matchesnot enough data
Erin Rich + Julie Bunting213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Bunting
57W–19L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.98
3.5
Bailey Wolff
41W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
Lisa Jokerst
30W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.91
Kelsey Robin
34W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.88
Katie Carpenter
39W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.84
Kristie Kraus
32W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.81
Erin Rich
64W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.78
Nicole Swiggett
79W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%13%87%
2.66
3
Cassidy Nelson
66W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
Sandie Barns
27W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
Hannah Irvine
7W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.45
Sarah Isbell
15W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Taylor Brisebois
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.