Teams

WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Miura

2026 WI Tri-Level · WI Mid Tri Men Doubles

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-17vs WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT AkyuzLost 03
L#1 DoublesNathan Bachmann / Brandon Dosdos vs Xiaotong Wang / Andrew Liu2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Happel / John Weyers vs Enes Akyuz / Brian Quinlivan0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAsa Miura / Kin Miura vs Erik Deetz / Christopher Cusack0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNathan Bachmann / Michael Happel vs David Stluka / Marius Dornhagen Schradermeier1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Wise / Asa Miura vs Joshua Brown / Miguel Garcia-Gosalvez6-7, 5-7
2026-02-24vs WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT IsenseeLost 03
L#1 DoublesNathan Bachmann / Brandon Dosdos vs Hiroshi Maeda / Justin Yee3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEdd Hellmer / John Weyers vs Erik Dustrude / Luis Rey4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesOguz Alagoz / Kin Miura vs Chase Peck / Andrew Thooft3-6, 3-6
2026-02-19vs WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT DundasLost 02
L#2 DoublesNathan Bachmann / Michael Happel vs Alexander Strunce / Krish M7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAsa Miura / John Weyers vs Hari Putti / Shaleen Deep6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNathan Bachmann / John Weyers vs Narman Antony Peter / Hai Nguyen6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAdam Wise / Oguz Alagoz vs John Gritt / Dhinesh Ravi Krishna7-5, 6-3
2026-02-05vs WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT RiceLost 01
L#2 DoublesEdd Hellmer / Michael Happel vs Harrison Moon / Woo J Kim4-6, 4-6
2026-01-29vs WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT SandovalLost 02
L#2 DoublesMichael Happel / John Weyers vs Michael Ohtake / Jun Hyung Chang2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesOguz Alagoz / Kin Miura vs Aidan Stuckert / Jack Brody6-7, 5-7
2026-01-22vs WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT KnutsonLost 02
L#2 DoublesEdd Hellmer / Nathan Bachmann vs Jason Knutson / Arune Brekke1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAsa Miura / Adam Wise vs Craig Bald / Mark Eriksson5-7, 0-6
2026-01-15vs WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT HanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJordan Mauk / Nathan Bachmann vs Timothy Daley / Nicholas Havlicek2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Weyers / Adam Wise vs Hongbo Chen / Zonglin Han1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJordan Mauk / Nathan Bachmann vs Andrew Nakatsuka / Matthew Bauman6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Happel / John Weyers vs Kevin Grant / Erich Palecek3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAdam Wise / Kin Miura vs John Montognese-Bergamini / Patrick Hoeth3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · WI Mid Tri Men Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Dundas9122822233
2WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Akyuz7322817217
3WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Sandoval7321923245
4WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Isensee73181229267
5WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Kosobucki64161430269
6WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Knutson55161430256
7WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Rice46121838310
8WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Bergamini46131741308
9WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Han2892146317
10WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Miura2892146320
11WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Antony Peter2872349324

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Jordan Mauk
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
4.00
Brandon Dosdos
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
3.79
Nathan Bachmann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Edd Hellmer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
John Weyers
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.52
Michael Happel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Adam Wise
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Oguz Alagoz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Kin Miura
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Asa Miura
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Wise + Edd Hellmer14655% games+2.3% vs expected
Brandon Dosdos + Jordan Mauk6649% games+0.8% vs expected
Nathan Bachmann + Jordan Mauk2439% games−1.9% vs expected
Brandon Dosdos + Asa Miura2743% games−3.3% vs expected
John Weyers + Asa Miura1536% games−4.0% vs expected
Adam Wise + Kin Miura2641% games−5.0% vs expected
Adam Wise + John Weyers5453% games−7.3% vs expected
Adam Wise + Asa Miura21335% games−12.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jordan Mauk
50W–46L career · 12 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Brandon Dosdos
167W–101L career · 11 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
4.00
Nathan Bachmann
23W–36L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Edd Hellmer
75W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
John Weyers
25W–27L career · 7 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.53
Michael Happel
10W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Adam Wise
90W–74L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Oguz Alagoz
16W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Kin Miura
7W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Asa Miura
14W–106L career · 4 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.