← Teams

MAC-Lekas/Burczak

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Jeffrey Bayless
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
—
JOHN KNOX
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Jim Lekas
published 3.5
—
Philip Flemming
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
William Reykalin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Tony Humpage
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.86
Matthew Casimo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Dean Dordevic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-05-17Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesTony Humpage / Jeffrey Bayless vs Kimbal Logan / Steve Thunstedt6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJOHN KNOX / Mark Mitchell vs Rolf Ellingsen / Bruce Yang6-4, 6-2
2024-05-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTony Humpage / Jeffrey Bayless vs Mike Baker / Bert Berends6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDave Hall / JOHN KNOX vs Larry Butrick / Jim George6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDean Dordevic / Philip Flemming vs Bob Anderson / Gary Rebello6-1, 6-1
2024-04-18Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMark Mitchell / JOHN KNOX vs Jim DeWeese / Gerald Chase7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Jim Lekas vs Tom Tsuruta / Dale Vandenburgh6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChip Burczak / William Reykalin vs Rex Smith / Michael Kohlhoff6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-11Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesChip Burczak / Tony Humpage vs Steve Russell / Clay Funkhouser6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Mulholland / Jeffrey Bayless vs Mister Archedon / Alan Jones6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDean Dordevic / Philip Flemming vs David Shook / Jon Mandeville6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-04Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMark Mitchell / Jeffrey Bayless vs Craig Frasier / John Hummel6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChip Burczak / Tony Humpage vs Jeff Wheeler / Jeff Gonzales6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDean Dordevic / Matthew Casimo vs Charles Gebhardt / Dave Sato6-2, 6-3
2024-03-29Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesPhilip Flemming / Michael Mulholland vs James Horen / William Pettis6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTony Humpage / JOHN KNOX vs Mark Becker / Andrew Kitchen5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Chip Burczak vs Thomas Mehlhorn / Doyle Dillon6-1, 6-0
2024-03-21Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesChip Burczak / Tony Humpage vs Rolf Ellingsen / Rick Raivio2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Mark Mitchell vs John Wallin / Kimbal Logan6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDean Dordevic / Matthew Casimo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-14Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJOHN KNOX / Mark Mitchell vs Christopher Thomas / Jim Gerber6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChip Burczak / Tony Humpage vs Roger North / John Popplewell6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jeffrey Bayless
130W–100L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
JOHN KNOX
23W–18L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jim Lekas
22W–12L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Philip Flemming
4W–11L career
not enough data
—
3.5
William Reykalin
5W–14L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Tony Humpage
99W–73L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3
Matthew Casimo
40W–103L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Dean Dordevic
9W–8L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.