Teams

Martin/Memphis

2026 Adult 55 & Over-Memphis · 4.0 Women 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-03vs Ansbro/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Hollis-Talley / Stacey Hyde vs Dee Pitawanakwat / Silvia Hecht0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKrista Barnhart / Cindy Miller vs Susan Ogg / Katharine Schuler1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKristi Sides / Jennifer Wright vs Wendy Ansbro / Perrin Hunter6-2, 6-1
2026-04-26vs Alfonso/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacey Hyde / Laura Hollis-Talley vs Gina Throckmorton / SUSAN WOODMAN7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Goodnight / Jorianne Siskin vs Rebecca Conrad / Rachel Rieves7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Fortenberry / Hanh Vaught vs Patricia Alfonso / Barb Lansky1-6, 4-6
2026-04-19vs Eddy/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesDarlene Loprete / Jorianne Siskin vs Kristy Pelt / Marnie Denman3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMissy Gulick / Jennifer Goodnight vs Carolyn Monistere / Beth McKnight6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Fortenberry / Hanh Vaught vs Vonya Day / Alison Drago7-5, 6-1
2026-04-12vs Stuart/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlly Boggan / Cindy Miller vs Lynn Stuart / Lesley Grubbs6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesStacey Hyde / Laura Hollis-Talley vs Elizabeth Bran / Marla Goodwin6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristi Sides / Jennifer Wright vs Ashley Wallace / Kimberly Laschober6-1, 6-4
2026-03-29vs Eddy/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristi Sides / Krista Barnhart vs Dawn Ton / Marnie Denman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSharon Dertien / Hanh Vaught vs Jennifer OConnell / Robin Thomas6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMissy Gulick / Jorianne Siskin vs Donna Kothe / Kristy Pelt6-2, 6-1
2026-03-22vs Higgins/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesMissy Gulick / Jorianne Siskin vs Melony Bratton / Leslie Barron7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStacey Hyde / Laura Hollis-Talley vs Donna Wolfanger / Mallie Nagle6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Wright / Ally Boggan vs Michele Smith / Anne Higgins6-3, 6-1
2026-03-08vs Ansbro/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesMissy Gulick / Laura Hollis-Talley vs Dee Pitawanakwat / Lu Schneider2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDarlene Loprete / Jorianne Siskin vs Silvia Hecht / Deana Templeton3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKristi Sides / Krista Barnhart vs Jenny Branston / Katharine Schuler1-6, 4-6
2026-03-01vs Alfonso/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Miller / Jorianne Siskin vs Patricia Alfonso / Stacey Dunevant6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristi Sides / Jennifer Wright vs SUSAN WOODMAN / Alison Smith7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMissy Gulick / Hanh Vaught vs Rebecca Conrad / Luz Scallion1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Kristi Sides
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.70
Stacey Hyde
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Laura Hollis-Talley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.67
Darlene Loprete
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Hanh Vaught
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Ally Boggan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Jorianne Siskin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Missy Gulick
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.42
Laura Fortenberry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Sharon Dertien
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Krista Barnhart
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Jennifer Goodnight
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Missy Gulick + Jorianne Siskin4163% games+11.9% vs expected
Stacey Hyde + Laura Hollis-Talley19658% games+5.2% vs expected
Kristi Sides + Krista Barnhart213 matchesnot enough data
Missy Gulick + Jennifer Goodnight213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristi Sides
16W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Stacey Hyde
33W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Laura Hollis-Talley
37W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Darlene Loprete
14W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Hanh Vaught
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Ally Boggan
17W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Jorianne Siskin
13W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Missy Gulick
40W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
Laura Fortenberry
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.42
Sharon Dertien
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23
Krista Barnhart
10W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.21
Jennifer Goodnight
18W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.