Teams

Smith/40/3.0/MD/CCLA

2026 BR Mixed 40 & Over · 3.0 BR (40&O) Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 2.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-23vs Chenevert/40/3.0/MD/BRECWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeremy Martin / Betty Treanor vs Stephanie Rubio / Sergio Rubio6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Smith / Hank Chiles vs Stephanie Chenevert / Jude Chenevert6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTerre Smith / Todd Smith vs George Stoulig / Melody Underwood6-3, 6-0
2026-07-16vs Dewitt/40/3.0/MD/SOACLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Treanor / Betty Treanor vs Gretchen McCurley / Tyson Duplantis6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mogenson / Jeremy Martin vs Jennifer Dewitt / Scott Bardwell6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTerre Smith / Todd Smith vs Leslie Duplantis / David Lindsey6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-09vs Pearson/40/3.0/MD/BRECWon 21
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Smith / Kip Smith vs Chandra Kandula / Amy Boudreaux1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mogenson / Hank Chiles vs Lacey Callegan / Chad Landry5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBetty Treanor / Steve Moore vs Adriana Ramirez / Scott Saporito6-3, 6-2
2026-06-25vs Piland/40/3.0/MD/UCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrew Treanor / Jennifer Mogenson vs William Adams / Tiffany Guitreau4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTerre Smith / Todd Smith vs Michael Dupont / Patricia Duvic2-6, 0-6
2026-06-11vs Chenevert/40/3.0/MD/BRECWon 30
W#1 DoublesValerie DeBosier / Jeremy Martin vs Melody Underwood / James Mason6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSteve Moore / Charlotte Smith vs Randy Pastuszek / Tracye Russo4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrew Treanor / Betty Treanor vs Stephanie Chenevert / Russ Ladnier6-1, 6-1
2026-05-28vs Dewitt/40/3.0/MD/SOACWon 21
L#1 DoublesKip Smith / Betty Treanor vs Gretchen McCurley / Tyson Duplantis1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTerre Smith / Todd Smith vs Jennifer Dewitt / Brian Begue7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaurie Ginn / Hank Chiles vs Terrel Thomas / David Lindsey6-3, 7-5
2026-05-21vs Pearson/40/3.0/MD/BRECWon 21
W#1 DoublesBetty Treanor / Steve Moore vs Katie Lasseigne / Chad Landry6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTerre Smith / Todd Smith vs Danielle Pearson / Brian Huber4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCharlotte Smith / Kip Smith vs Mary Saporito / Scott Saporito6-3, 6-4
2026-05-14vs Piland/40/3.0/MD/UCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKip Smith / Charlotte Smith vs Steve Caruso / Tiffany Guitreau2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesScott Ginn / Jennifer Mogenson vs Matt Hunt / Michelle Hollenshead1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Moore / Betty Treanor vs Justin Day / Cortney Wagner4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 BR (40&O) Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Piland/40/3.0/MD/UC802227140
2Smith/40/3.0/MD/CCLA53131125208
3Pearson/40/3.0/MD/BREC35101430241
4Dewitt/40/3.0/MD/SOAC35111331232
5Chenevert/40/3.0/MD/BREC1742043281

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Betty Treanor
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
3.10
Kip Smith
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Valerie DeBosier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Jennifer Mogenson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Steve Moore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Scott Ginn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Jeremy Martin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Terre Smith
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Laurie Ginn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Hank Chiles
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Kaylin Percy
published
2.60
Andrew Treanor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.43
Jan Chiles
published
Steven Debosier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Moore + Betty Treanor213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Betty Treanor
24W–6L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
Kip Smith
36W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Valerie DeBosier
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Jennifer Mogenson
42W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.02
Steve Moore
12W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Scott Ginn
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Jeremy Martin
12W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Terre Smith
23W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Laurie Ginn
17W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
Hank Chiles
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Kaylin Percy
7W–15L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Andrew Treanor
11W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%24%76%
2.60
Jan Chiles
18W–21L career · no lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.43
Steven Debosier
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.