Teams

Grand Slam: Spinderellas

2022 18&Over Women Day Winter · 4.0 Day

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-29vs NRRC: ButterfliesWon 10
W#3 DoublesDominique Marder / Jill Newman vs Darcy Froehlich / Kathryn Biggs3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-03-24vs TIA GRINDERS 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTina Reid / Jill Newman vs Veronica Coach / Dawn Hone6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-03-10vs Sportime Harbor IslandSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTina Reid / Jill Newman vs Sally Connolly / Joanie Terraciano7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDominique Marder / Giovanna Miller vs Susanne Sparks / Deb Parnes6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-02-28vs Lifetime Athletic PearlWon 30
W#1 DoublesKate Jennings / Jane Kim vs Cheryl Orifici / Wenchun Wu6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Shropshire / Alina Sherman vs Lisa Sippel / Christine Titone6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGiovanna Miller / Kelly Ryan-Gartrell vs Patty Martin / Amanda Lovejoy4-6, 6-4
2022-02-16vs Rye Racquet Club: RRC WinterWon 21
L#1 DoublesTina Reid / Jill Newman vs Jorrie Bruffett / Johanna Olsborg2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKate Jennings / Jennifer Shannon vs Sandra Khouri / Kristen Woll6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Cannavino / Donna Knox vs Tracey Forte / Sally Masucci7-6, 6-0
2022-02-09vs Greenwich Racquet ClubWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Newman / Tina Reid vs Lesley MacLeod / Ann Zaminski6-4, 6-1
2022-02-02vs NRRC: ButterfliesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTina Reid / Jill Newman vs Cristina Casati-Lewis / Jelena Spyropoulos6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKaty Gonnelli / Giovanna Miller vs Darcy Froehlich / Lori Abrams1-6, 5-7
2022-01-26vs TIA GRINDERS 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesTina Reid / Jill Newman vs Carol Murray / Berry Ravitz6-3, 6-2
2022-01-10vs Armonk Indoor: LobstoppersLost 01
L#1 DoublesTina Reid / Jill Newman vs Elizabeth Leary / Nicole Klausz2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Melissa Straub
published 4
3.98
Emilie Chang
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.97
Kate Jennings
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Katharina Lewis
published
3.84
Debbie Cannavino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Michele Tesei
published
Alina Sherman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Dominique Marder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Katy Gonnelli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Kelly Ryan-Gartrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Jill Newman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
Giovanna Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Donna Knox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Kim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Jennifer Shannon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Shropshire
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tina Reid
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Shropshire + Alina Sherman13263% games+8.1% vs expected
Katharina Lewis + Kate Jennings10363% games+5.5% vs expected
Giovanna Miller + Jennifer Shannon12756% games+4.1% vs expected
Katharina Lewis + Michele Tesei9263% games+3.4% vs expected
Donna Knox + Melissa Straub17561% games+2.7% vs expected
Melissa Straub + Julie Shropshire7161% games+1.8% vs expected
Jill Newman + Tina Reid773954% games−0.5% vs expected
Jill Newman + Kate Jennings3351% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Melissa Straub
226W–80L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
4.03
4.5
Emilie Chang
232W–144L career · 4 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.98
Kate Jennings
109W–113L career · 6 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.97
Katharina Lewis
158W–121L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Debbie Cannavino
116W–45L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
Michele Tesei
53W–25L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Alina Sherman
61W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Dominique Marder
49W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Katy Gonnelli
45W–50L career · 1 line in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Kelly Ryan-Gartrell
100W–74L career · 1 line in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.60
4
Jill Newman
160W–102L career · 8 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Giovanna Miller
51W–50L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Donna Knox
50W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jane Kim
124W–58L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Shannon
67W–31L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Julie Shropshire
55W–19L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tina Reid
115W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.