Teams

7-Millholland-HR

2022 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-02vs 5-DLiller-HSLost 01
L#1 SinglesKim Cabelka vs Tynita Edwards2-6, 5-7
2022-04-27vs 4-DBaker-Eno-40+ 3.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLisa Hsu vs Sarah Franks3-6, 3-6
2022-04-20vs 2-SOnstad-CHTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesLisa Hsu vs Bailey Cook1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Clough / Kim Cabelka vs Cynthia Kleeberger / Sarah Towles1-6, 4-6
2022-04-11vs 9-AMcneill-CCCLost 01
L#1 SinglesKim Cabelka vs Tammy Chin4-6, 3-6
2022-04-03vs 10-CBlommer-EnoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKim Cabelka vs Adair Humphrey6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Hsu / Constanza de Radcliffe vs Camille Blommer / Ranota Hall6-3, 6-0
2022-03-21vs 3-CIrish-EnoLost 01
L#1 SinglesLisa Hsu vs Abigail Holden0-6, 1-6
2022-03-07vs 8-JYoung-EnoWon 10
W#1 SinglesLisa Hsu vs Pamela Howell-Davis6-4, 6-1
2022-03-02vs 6-KLaan-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesKim Cabelka vs Kolleen Fitzgerald6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTracy Shelton / Lisa Hsu vs Sara Lawrence / Susan Graff0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Lisa Hsu
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Alexandra Millholland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Kim Cabelka
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Glenda Dinyari
published 3
2.65
Tina Prinstein
published
2.57
Jan ORegan
published
2.49
Nancy Rocamora
published
2.44
Marcella Bria
published
2.41
Tracy Shelton
published
2.28
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa Hsu
93W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Alexandra Millholland
53W–103L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Kim Cabelka
89W–93L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Glenda Dinyari
1W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tina Prinstein
10W–19L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
Jan ORegan
10W–34L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
Nancy Rocamora
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.49
Marcella Bria
1W–12L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.44
Tracy Shelton
2W–20L career · no lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.41
2.5
Constanza de Radcliffe
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.