Teams

COLLIER - Marco YMCA - Nelz

2021 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.29 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-10vs Riverstone - C. BurkeLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Ceryak / Betsy Conte vs Nikki Miller / Tracy McAdams2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAna Cecilia Isaza vs Christine Ragain7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-26vs Naples Bay Resort - C. BradyWon 20
W#1 DoublesJan Jackman / Ana Cecilia Isaza vs Gail Oroho / Barbara Seymour6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLori Ceryak / Betsy Conte vs Lisa Baker / Linda Farrow6-1, 6-1
2021-04-25vs The Quarry - MooneyWon 21
L#1 SinglesAna Cecilia Isaza vs Angela Knapp0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLori Ceryak / Pattie Yergler vs Haewon Feltsman / Catherine Gallagher3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBetsy Conte / Neli Nelz vs Shelly Brown / Keryl Ball4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-04-13vs Vineyards -Won 20
W#1 DoublesBetsy Conte / Kristin Gilbert vs Renee DiGangi / Margot Moran6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Rafferty / Ana Cecilia Isaza vs Margaret Callahan / Sharon Dexter6-1, 6-0
2021-04-05vs Pelican Bay Park - PerrinoWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Ceryak / Betsy Conte vs Sandy Perrino / Michelle Minor4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAna Cecilia Isaza / Susan Rafferty vs Diana Provence / Michelle Ruffing6-4, 6-1
2021-03-29vs Heritage Bay - K. KeillorSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLori Ceryak / Pattie Yergler vs Maureen Rennie / Rachel Plisko6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAna Cecilia Isaza vs Jill Sanders6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2021-03-22vs Fiddlers Creek - L. FarnhamWon 10
W#1 DoublesAna Cecilia Isaza / Pattie Yergler vs Dawn Cooper / Gail Gattas6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Inge Lund
published 4
3.46
Ana Cecilia Isaza
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.23
Lori Ceryak
published
3.21
Pattie Yergler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Jan Jackman
published
2.87
Jacquie Currie
published 3
Betsy Conte
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.62
Eva Dotti
published 3
2.61
Laura Hansmann
published
2.59
Susan Rafferty
published
2.53
Cheryl Trzcinski
published 3
2.44
Neli Nelz
published
Melanie Rose
published
Paula Crane
published
Sigrid Miranda
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Hansmann + Susan Rafferty3354% games+2.7% vs expected
Pattie Yergler + Ana Cecilia Isaza16263% gamesnot enough data
Pattie Yergler + Betsy Conte6654% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Trzcinski + Paula Crane2642% gamesnot enough data
Eva Dotti + Betsy Conte213 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Conte + Ana Cecilia Isaza303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Inge Lund
17W–15L career · no lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Ana Cecilia Isaza
200W–102L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.46
Lori Ceryak
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Pattie Yergler
220W–127L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Jan Jackman
12W–34L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Jacquie Currie
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Betsy Conte
212W–172L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Eva Dotti
49W–55L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
2.62
Laura Hansmann
13W–26L career · no lines in 2021
19%80%<1%
2.61
Susan Rafferty
5W–16L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Cheryl Trzcinski
30W–70L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
2.53
Neli Nelz
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.44
Melanie Rose
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Paula Crane
6W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sigrid Miranda
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.