Teams

Tan - SHL

2023 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-28vs Penn - RSSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAmelia Gandy vs Thuy Nguyen2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCherie Tan / Tori Baker vs Tanya Hughes / Ingrid Corbett6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-03-21vs Bryan - RSWon 21
W#1 SinglesAmelia Gandy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCherie Tan / Anne Elidemir vs Mary Bryan / Van Hughes7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Kris Pritchard vs Barbara Montano / Barbara French2-6, 5-7
2023-03-14vs Bonsignore - RSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmelia Gandy / Melanie DiLoreto vs Susan Bonsignore / Sally Bergosh6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Kris Pritchard vs Pam Halstead / Joyce Cook3-6, 1-6
2023-02-28vs Bryan - RSLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmelia Gandy / Dodi Stringfellow vs Van Hughes / Elizabeth Newton6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-02-21vs Bonsignore - RSWon 30
W#1 SinglesAmelia Gandy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStacey Martin / Dodi Stringfellow vs Joyce Cook / Sara Davy6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCherie Tan / Maria Hicks vs Bonnie Bucco / Liz Payne6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Stacey Martin
published
3.46
Amelia Gandy
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.41
Cherie Tan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Melanie DiLoreto
published
3.31
Nancy Ellman
published
3.22
Dodi Stringfellow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Tori Baker
published
Kris Pritchard
published
Maria Hicks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherie Tan + Dodi Stringfellow361560% games−5.5% vs expected
Amelia Gandy + Dodi Stringfellow224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Martin
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.81
3.5
Amelia Gandy
77W–56L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Cherie Tan
146W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Melanie DiLoreto
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
Nancy Ellman
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Dodi Stringfellow
120W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Tori Baker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.93
Kris Pritchard
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maria Hicks
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.