Teams

Ballsy Babes

2024 18&Over Women Day League · 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-26vs Ball BustersWon 32
L#1 DoublesKimberly Ajavananda / Kate Seaman vs Laura Govan / Kim Politsky2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDaniella Wisniewski vs Lisa Engel6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Rooney / Kathryn Viggiano vs Michelle Trosper / Danielle Davi3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDanielle Roman vs Alyson Mccarthy6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmy Suchanek / Kirsten Salerno vs Gina Pento / Laurie Masuret4-6, 5-4, 1-0
2024-06-19vs Centercourt ChathamWon 41
W#1 DoublesKate Seaman / Kimberly Ajavananda vs Deborah Zajkowski / Andrea Kayyali6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDaniella Wisniewski vs Randi Sellinger6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Willis / Claire Garland vs Kristi Payne / Amy Esralew7-6, 5-3
W#2 SinglesDanielle Roman vs Nancy Schneier6-3, 3-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Lustig / Amy Suchanek vs Colleen D'Alesandro / Sinead Bennett3-6, 4-6
2024-06-05vs Ball BustersLost 23
L#1 DoublesKate Seaman / RSonia Waldman vs Laura Fiske / Kristine Phillips4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesDaniella Wisniewski vs Rachel Lightman6-2, 5-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Rooney / Kathryn Viggiano vs Danielle Davi / Michelle Trosper6-4, 4-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesStephanie Manson vs Lisa Engel0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Suchanek / Kim Lustig vs Bonnie Frey / Alyson Mccarthy2-6, 2-6
2024-05-29vs Centercourt ChathamWon 32
L#1 DoublesRSonia Waldman / Molly Higgins vs Margaret Haughey / MIRABEL GRAHAM3-6, 5-6
W#1 SinglesDaniella Wisniewski vs Vivian Xiaocheng Li6-2, 5-2
W#2 DoublesKathryn Viggiano / Karen Rooney vs Angela Lin / Kristi Payne6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesStephanie Manson vs Nancy Schneier1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Braumann / Janet Gillespie vs Tarana Oommen / Amy Esralew6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-15vs Ball BustersLost 23
W#1 DoublesLiane van Etten / Antoinette Welsh vs JANE LAI / Kristine Phillips6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMichelle Oates vs Rachel Lightman5-7, 2-3
W#2 DoublesHeather Willis / Kate Seaman vs Kim Politsky / Christina Waggoner7-5, 5-3
L#2 SinglesDanielle Roman vs Lisa Engel6-7, 1-5
L#3 DoublesKim Lustig / Amy Suchanek vs Alyson Mccarthy / Gina Pento2-6, 1-6
2024-05-08vs Centercourt ChathamSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLiane van Etten / Antoinette Welsh vs Margaret Haughey / Suzanne Loughrey6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMichelle Oates vs Andrea Kayyali2-6, 5-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRSonia Waldman / Kirsten Salerno vs Angela Lin / Vivian Xiaocheng Li6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMolly Higgins / Lisa Braumann vs Gianna Giacona / MIRABEL GRAHAM7-6, 2-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Liane van Etten
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Antoinette Welsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Daniella Wisniewski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.56
Kathryn Viggiano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Michelle Oates
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.48
Kate Seaman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Karen Rooney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Claire Garland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Amy Suchanek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Danielle Roman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Kimberly Ajavananda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Heather Willis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Gillespie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Lustig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kirsten Salerno
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa Braumann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Molly Higgins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
RSonia Waldman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stephanie Manson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liane van Etten + Antoinette Welsh221358% games+7.8% vs expected
RSonia Waldman + Lisa Braumann131251% games+4.8% vs expected
Kathryn Viggiano + Karen Rooney13851% games+3.6% vs expected
Heather Willis + Claire Garland141350% games+3.5% vs expected
Kate Seaman + RSonia Waldman1542% games−0.9% vs expected
Kate Seaman + Kimberly Ajavananda364548% games−2.6% vs expected
Kate Seaman + Lisa Braumann31038% games−4.8% vs expected
RSonia Waldman + Liane van Etten4157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liane van Etten
95W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.89
4
Antoinette Welsh
66W–48L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.88
4
Daniella Wisniewski
25W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathryn Viggiano
45W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.56
Michelle Oates
15W–55L career · 2 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55
3.5
Kate Seaman
108W–169L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Karen Rooney
38W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Claire Garland
45W–35L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Amy Suchanek
33W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Danielle Roman
39W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Kimberly Ajavananda
140W–123L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Heather Willis
48W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.08
Janet Gillespie
23W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kim Lustig
8W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kirsten Salerno
51W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Braumann
50W–70L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Molly Higgins
40W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
RSonia Waldman
71W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Manson
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.