Teams

TRC:No Love Loss:Broderick

2021 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 W - 2

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-05-02vs MIT:Nice Aces:LoRicco/UmbrichtWon 21
W#1 DoublesJane Kim / Marykate Root vs Michele Palanzo / Kristin Sabatini6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKerstin Lebel / Claudia Lacasia vs Francesca Loricco / Virginia Greatsinger7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSue Broderick / Misao Naito vs Barbara Fries / Graziana Weill7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-18vs KH:New Ad-Itudes:BrownWon 21
L#1 DoublesKerstin Lebel / Claudia Lacasia vs Mallory Close / Shira McCain4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky vs Elichia Brown / Senta Cassell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarykate Root / Jane Kim vs Kathi Holbert / Tory Woodruff6-2, 7-5
W#1 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Kerstin Lebel vs Susan Fidaleo / Kristine Borchetta7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJane Kim / Deirdre Andreoli vs Deborah Salomon / Toni Sturm5-7, 3-5
W#3 DoublesSue Broderick / Misao Naito vs Nanci Kirshner / Amy Silberfein6-4, 6-4
2021-03-21vs KH:New Ad-Itudes:BrownWon 31
W#1 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Kerstin Lebel vs Tiffany Bevacqua / Kelly Thomas6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHetal Kocinsky vs Michelle Kanter0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky vs Elichia Brown / Laura Emerson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Kim / Marykate Root vs Barbara Kulesz / Lisa Duffy6-2, 6-0
2021-03-14vs MIT:Nice Aces:LoRicco/UmbrichtLost 12
L#1 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Kerstin Lebel vs Francesca Loricco / Rebecca Tessitore4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky vs Linda Bonadies / Erzsebet Pusztai6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHetal Kocinsky / Cher Anderson vs Barbara Fries / Mari Ullyett5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Marykate Root vs Toni Sturm / Nanci Kirshner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSue Broderick / Cher Anderson vs Wendy Gardiner / Kristine Borchetta6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHetal Kocinsky / Deirdre Andreoli vs Amy Silberfein / Wendy Bennett6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesKerstin Lebel / Claudia Lacasia vs Toni Sturm / Wendy Bennett4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky vs Wendy Gardiner / Deborah Salomon6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHetal Kocinsky / Lorraine Oldale vs Nanci Kirshner / Amy Silberfein3-6, 3-6
2020-11-22vs KH:New Ad-Itudes:BrownWon 30
W#1 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Kerstin Lebel vs Elichia Brown / Senta Cassell6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky vs Lisa Duffy / Shira McCain6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMisao Naito / Rosemary Klein vs Anne-Lise Brown / Kathi Holbert6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesKerstin Lebel / Claudia Lacasia vs Susan Fidaleo / Kristine Borchetta6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky vs Wendy Gardiner / Maureen Vlak7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJane Kim / Marykate Root vs Toni Sturm / Wendy Bennett7-5, 6-1
2020-11-01vs MIT:Nice Aces:LoRicco/UmbrichtWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Kerstin Lebel vs Francesca Loricco / Rebecca Tessitore6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSue Broderick / Rosemary Klein vs Nancy McDonough / Mary Kaump6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPatricia Pavoni / Deirdre Andreoli vs Judit Farkas / Erzsebet Pusztai2-6, 2-6
2020-10-18vs KH:New Ad-Itudes:BrownLost 03
L#1 DoublesRosemary Klein / Hetal Kocinsky vs Laura Emerson / Kathi Holbert3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCher Anderson / Sue Broderick vs Tiffany Bevacqua / Elichia Brown5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeirdre Andreoli / Misao Naito vs Claire Londa / Laura Saggese5-7, 5-5
2020-10-04vs MIT:Nice Aces:LoRicco/UmbrichtLost 12
L#1 DoublesSue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky vs Francesca Loricco / Rebecca Tessitore2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHetal Kocinsky / Rosemary Klein vs Nancy McDonough / Audra Edele3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeirdre Andreoli / Patricia Pavoni vs Maureen Ferguson / Mari Ullyett6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W - 2 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Claudia Lacasia
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 4
3.84
Melissa Dancy
published
3.76
Sue Broderick
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Ayo Haynes
published 4
3.68
Hetal Kocinsky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.58
Mary Zubrinsky
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.58
Rosemary Klein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Deirdre Andreoli
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.51
Gillian Sizer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
Cher Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Tina Rivera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Misao Naito
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Lorraine Oldale
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Jane Kim
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kerstin Lebel
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
Marykate Root
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marykate Root + Jane Kim17067% games+17.0% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Marykate Root6070% games+12.6% vs expected
Kerstin Lebel + Claudia Lacasia15459% games+7.8% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Claudia Lacasia1551% games+6.7% vs expected
Misao Naito + Rosemary Klein4549% games+6.2% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Rosemary Klein10658% games+5.0% vs expected
Claudia Lacasia + Deirdre Andreoli10654% games+3.5% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Mary Zubrinsky311554% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Claudia Lacasia
154W–83L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.87
Melissa Dancy
9W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.84
Sue Broderick
149W–98L career · 12 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Ayo Haynes
4W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Hetal Kocinsky
50W–60L career · 6 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
Mary Zubrinsky
57W–38L career · 7 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
Rosemary Klein
46W–57L career · 4 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Deirdre Andreoli
42W–51L career · 5 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Gillian Sizer
80W–50L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Cher Anderson
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tina Rivera
101W–124L career · 8 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Misao Naito
38W–63L career · 4 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
Lorraine Oldale
32W–51L career · 5 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.08
Jane Kim
124W–58L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kerstin Lebel
34W–41L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marykate Root
58W–47L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.