Teams

Sawgrass Pella

2025 Duval Combo 50 & Over Summer · 7.5 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-20vs ABCC GoodrichWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane Lickliter / Alicia Sprecher vs Jayme Lemke / Mary Orr6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeidra Radel / Kim Gibson vs Amy Burdette / Lisa Goodrich7-5, 6-0
2025-09-10vs Marsh Landing KerrWon 10
W#1 DoublesDarlene Deo / Diane Lickliter vs Aimee Spirlin / Alixe Stamatogiannakis6-4, 6-1
2025-07-26vs Marsh Landing KerrWon 10
W#1 DoublesDarlene Deo / Alicia Sprecher vs Alixe Stamatogiannakis / Ann Casey6-2, 6-3
2025-07-20vs Club Continental PinhoLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarlene Deo / Lisa Pella vs Donna Marceau / Timothe Romani3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Deidra Radel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Darlene Deo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Sherill Herzfeld
published
3.69
Diane Lickliter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.64
Lisa Pella
published
3.42
Aisling Toby
published 3.5
3.41
Alicia Sprecher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Mary Coban
published
3.30
Julie Barney
published
3.23
Lorrayne Carless
published
3.20
Terry Heard
published
3.12
Jennifer Werba
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorrayne Carless + Aisling Toby3344% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Pella + Aisling Toby224 matchesnot enough data
Aisling Toby + Alicia Sprecher213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Coban + Julie Barney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deidra Radel
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Darlene Deo
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Sherill Herzfeld
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Diane Lickliter
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.69
Lisa Pella
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.64
3.5
Aisling Toby
31W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Alicia Sprecher
11W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Mary Coban
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
Julie Barney
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.30
Lorrayne Carless
19W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Terry Heard
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Jennifer Werba
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.