Teams

Hamrick-Bear Pen

2025 Adult 18 & Over-DLT · Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.92 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-21vs Boykin-CCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesShelby Ballinger / Brittany McTeer vs Beth Joel / Emmy Millwood6-4, 6-4
2025-04-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesHaley Hamrick / Shelby Ballinger vs Lindsay Powers / Jessica Barnes6-1, 6-4
2025-03-25vs Aylward/Shannon-CCCLost 23
L#1 DoublesAnne Bailey Jernigan / Allison Brady vs Ann Morgan / Amy Denton Maggio2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesErinn Grady vs Maribeth Crews4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrittany McTeer / Amee West vs Kristen Crow / Sarah Aylward4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMeredith Etheridge vs Whitney Morgan0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Brocato / Haley Hamrick vs Brittany Bowen / Brooke Cundiff6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Myers-CCC60191126241
2Hamrick-Bear Pen4221921196
3Boykin-CCC24131736263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Latoya Sykes
published
Amanda Snell
published 3
2.65
Brittany McTeer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Lauren Brocato
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Katie Boykin
published
2.45
Anne Bailey Jernigan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Haley Hamrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Allison Brady
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Amee West
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.13
Alex Brocato
published 2.5
Erinn Grady
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Meredith Etheridge
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Molly McAdams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Brocato + Haley Hamrick4348% games+5.1% vs expected
Latoya Sykes + Anne Bailey Jernigan314 matchesnot enough data
Amee West + Brittany McTeer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Latoya Sykes
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Amanda Snell
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Brittany McTeer
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Lauren Brocato
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%22%78%
2.61
Katie Boykin
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%36%64%
2.55
3
Anne Bailey Jernigan
5W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.45
Haley Hamrick
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%66%34%
2.44
3
Allison Brady
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
3
Amee West
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.40
2.5
Alex Brocato
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Erinn Grady
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Meredith Etheridge
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Molly McAdams
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.