Teams

LLTC - Queens of the Court

2025 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Singles Wednesday · 4.0 Ladies Singles

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-26vs Willowfork - RacquettesWon 30
W#1 SinglesDanielle Talbot vs Andrea Verges6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSamantha Vulpis vs Georgina Allende7-5, 6-1
W#3 SinglesEmily Warnecke vs Maryna Poltavska6-0, 6-2
2025-03-19vs LLTC - Serving SirensLost 12
L#1 SinglesEmily Warnecke vs Rebecca Haskin6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSusan Speer vs Sarah Crulcich3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesKristin Montalvo vs Lessette Hubenak7-5, 6-4
2025-03-06vs LLTC - Serving SirensWon 31
W#1 SinglesEllie Triesch vs Sarah Crulcich6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesEmily Warnecke vs Katie Brisbois7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDanielle Talbot vs Ashten Ruck6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#4 SinglesCaroline Meade vs Holly Krivokapich2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Warnecke vs Aileen Rios2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDanielle Talbot vs Maria Garcia-Mireles5-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesSusan Speer vs Poonam Yadav7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Ladies Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Samantha Vulpis
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.79
Ellie Triesch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.77
Danielle Talbot
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.54
Emily Warnecke
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.53
Susan Speer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.48
Patricia Sulaiman
published
3.47
Caroline Meade
usually #4 Singles 100% · published 4
3.38
Kristin Montalvo
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.30
Karen Hellman-Diego
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Talbot + Kristin Montalvo033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Vulpis
57W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.82
Ellie Triesch
24W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Danielle Talbot
17W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Emily Warnecke
57W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
Susan Speer
17W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.53
Patricia Sulaiman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
4
Caroline Meade
16W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Kristin Montalvo
92W–54L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Karen Hellman-Diego
22W–19L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.