Teams

MVS Barnes SSL A40-4.0W

2023 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A40&O 4.0 W (6 player)

12 players · average NTRP 4.30 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-07vs MVC Slater SSL A40-4.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesBecky Musgraves / Sarah Williams vs Amy McKenzie / Amber Slater7-5, 6-4
2023-05-17vs PA Fiscus SSL A40-4.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesBecky Musgraves / Teresa Nelson vs Meredith Mast / Mary Muller6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmi Mueller / Sharon Barnes vs Rosemary Fiscus / Sherri Lawrence6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Bell / Michelle Spees vs Christina Sanchez-Martin / Joan Hannadarrell3-6, 0-6
2023-04-26vs GR Kessel SSL A40-4.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesBecky Musgraves / Teresa Nelson vs Cynthia Papp / Naoko Kobrak6-0, 6-4
2023-04-19vs WH Carlin SSL A40-4.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesBecky Musgraves / Sarah Williams vs Anna Carlin / Jalynn Schnr7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-12vs PA Fiscus SSL A40-4.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesBecky Musgraves / Teresa Nelson vs Christina Sanchez-Martin / Joan Hannadarrell6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDanielle Juhle / Sharon Barnes vs Mary Muller / Meredith Mast4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeera Lee / Kerry Clay vs Rosemary Fiscus / Amy Grasman6-1, 6-2
2023-03-15vs HC Kroeze SSL A40-4.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesBecky Musgraves / Sarah Williams vs Tanya Gonzalez / Carol Genzink6-4, 6-3
2023-02-08vs GR Kessel SSL A40-4.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesBecky Musgraves / Stacy Ehrlich vs Cynthia Papp / Naoko Kobrak6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A40&O 4.0 W (6 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Danielle Juhle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Debbie Buchan
published 4.5
4.04
Becky Musgraves
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.01
Emi Mueller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.98
Teresa Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Sharon Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Stacy Ehrlich
published
3.80
Meera Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Kerry Clay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Marie Shea
published
Michelle Spees
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Ehrlich + Meera Lee8268% games+11.7% vs expected
Sharon Barnes + Teresa Nelson4262% games+6.1% vs expected
Kerry Clay + Meera Lee25562% games+3.6% vs expected
Marie Shea + Stacy Ehrlich19565% games+3.3% vs expected
Sharon Barnes + Meera Lee6163% games+3.0% vs expected
Sharon Barnes + Debbie Buchan31563% games+1.9% vs expected
Becky Musgraves + Teresa Nelson10553% games+0.4% vs expected
Marie Shea + Meera Lee12655% games+0.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Danielle Juhle
57W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Debbie Buchan
158W–61L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Becky Musgraves
137W–79L career · 7 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Emi Mueller
85W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%46%54%
4.01
Teresa Nelson
67W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.98
Sharon Barnes
174W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.88
Stacy Ehrlich
118W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Meera Lee
107W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Kerry Clay
86W–23L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Marie Shea
76W–25L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Michelle Spees
30W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Ryan
23W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.