Teams

Sims/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Men - Saturday Daytime

13 players · average NTRP / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-05-09vs Cooke/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesPaul Lochmiller / Michael Patterson vs Ben Lankford / Jacob Rodriguez6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSpencer Sharp vs Garrett Tuttle6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Cougan / Roger Smith vs Luke Townsend / Jake Padilla6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJerry Sims vs Troy HIPPENSTEEL2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNathan DeWitt / Shalin Shah vs Joseph-ross Smith / John Hollinsworth3-6, 4-6
2026-05-02vs Alessi/Pershad/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesMichael Patterson / Paul Lochmiller vs Yash Pershad / Andrew Stankiewicz6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTaylor Bright vs Joseph Wrubel1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRoger Smith / John Cougan vs Jack Ramthun / Philippe Bronchtein4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJerry Sims / Spencer Sharp vs Max Grushin / Mateo Arana7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men - Saturday Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
John Cougan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Shalin Shah
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Paul Lochmiller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Michael Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Palmer Pillans
published
2.81
Nathan DeWitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Patrick Merkel
published
2.79
Roger Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Gregg Bolton
published
2.71
Kurt Guske
published
2.68
Taylor Bright
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.53
Jerry Sims
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Spencer Sharp
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roger Smith + John Cougan3261% gamesnot enough data
Roger Smith + Paul Lochmiller224 matchesnot enough data
Paul Lochmiller + John Cougan314 matchesnot enough data
Palmer Pillans + Paul Lochmiller123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Patterson + Paul Lochmiller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Cougan
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Shalin Shah
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
Paul Lochmiller
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Michael Patterson
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Palmer Pillans
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Nathan DeWitt
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Patrick Merkel
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Roger Smith
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Gregg Bolton
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Kurt Guske
10W–23L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Taylor Bright
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Jerry Sims
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.53
Spencer Sharp
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.