Teams

Orange/Mundelein

2026 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 55 & Over Winter - DAY · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over-Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-21vs Sanlando-PhanWon 21
L#1 DoublesRamaswami Krishnan / Tyler Dahn vs Eduardo Martinez Castillo / Rob Haben4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBing Tien / David Jablonski vs Ed Parks / Esteban Scornik6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFrank Vilece / Preston Carpenter vs Tom Phan / Long Vuong6-1, 6-1
2026-03-14vs Sanlando-PhanWon 21
W#1 DoublesKenneth Lim / John McGrath vs Orlando Monge / Tim Thomas6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesScott Bigham / Todd Demetriades vs Esteban Scornik / Rob Haben6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFrank Vilece / Preston Carpenter vs Ed Parks / Tom Phan6-1, 6-2
2026-03-10vs Sanlando-PhanWon 21
W#1 DoublesFrank Vilece / Preston Carpenter vs Tim Thomas / Rob Haben3-6, 3-5
W#2 DoublesBing Tien / David Jablonski vs Esteban Scornik / Long Vuong7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTed Mundelein / Todd Demetriades vs Tom Phan / Eduardo Martinez Castillo6-7, 4-6
2026-02-21vs Sanlando-PhanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesFrank Vilece / Randolph Wisor vs Ed Parks / Tim Thomas6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTed Mundelein / Fernando Santiago vs Esteban Scornik / Rob Haben3-6, 3-6
2026-02-07vs Sanlando-PhanWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobert Vilece / Randolph Wisor vs Orlando Monge / Ed Parks2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn McGrath / Kenneth Lim vs Eduardo Martinez Castillo / Esteban Scornik6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesFernando Santiago / Ted Mundelein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-07vs Sanlando-PhanWon 30
W#1 DoublesRamaswami Krishnan / Tyler Dahn vs Tim Thomas / Long Vuong6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesScott Bigham / Kenneth Lim vs Eduardo Martinez Castillo / Esteban Scornik6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJohn McGrath / Todd Demetriades vs Rob Haben / Ed Parks6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-17vs Sanlando-PhanWon 21
W#1 DoublesRamaswami Krishnan / Tyler Dahn vs Tom Phan / Scott Sullivan6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesScott Bigham / Frank Vilece vs Eduardo Martinez Castillo / Esteban Scornik3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRandolph Wisor / Robert Vilece vs Ed Parks / Tim Thomas6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over-Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Orange/Mundelein7016513147
2Sanlando-Phan0751634229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Jablonski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
Kenneth Lim
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
John McGrath
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Randolph Wisor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Frank Vilece
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.72
Scott Bigham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Tyler Dahn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Robert Vilece
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Fernando Santiago
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Ramaswami Krishnan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Todd Demetriades
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Preston Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Bing Tien
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ted Mundelein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Dahn + Ramaswami Krishnan3649% games−9.5% vs expected
Scott Bigham + Frank Vilece224 matchesnot enough data
John McGrath + Kenneth Lim224 matchesnot enough data
Frank Vilece + Randolph Wisor314 matchesnot enough data
Preston Carpenter + Frank Vilece303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Jablonski
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kenneth Lim
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
John McGrath
46W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Randolph Wisor
10W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Frank Vilece
10W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Scott Bigham
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Tyler Dahn
100W–88L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Robert Vilece
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
Fernando Santiago
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.65
Ramaswami Krishnan
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Todd Demetriades
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Preston Carpenter
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Bing Tien
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Ted Mundelein
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.