Teams

Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.0T

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

21 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-18vs Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0TLost 02
L#2 DoublesMaria Hasbany / Lauren Reid vs Kyla Obert / Amy Houstoun0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKasey Colvin / Brenda Talavera vs Jacqueline Carson / Jessica Weinblatt2-6, 4-6
2026-06-09Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKasey Colvin / Rochelle Watson vs Julie Hoang / Sarah Wollitz2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesHeather Neilson vs Jessica Thota5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Suter / Maria Hasbany vs Hilary McNamara / Michelle Buchanan4-6, 3-2
2026-06-09vs The Nelson/Wood W4.0TLost 01
L#3 DoublesTiffany Webster / Kasey Colvin vs Laurie Spicer / August Wood1-6, 5-7
2026-05-28vs Royal Oaks/Munir W4.0TSplit 11
L#2 SinglesHeather Neilson vs Andrea Bradford2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMaria Hasbany / Lola Lott vs Sandra Zorn / Anne-Marie Morrow6-3, 6-4
2026-05-14vs North Texas RC/Weber W4.0TWon 20
W#2 SinglesTiffany Webster vs Traci Balao3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLola Lott / Abby Thompson vs Louise Master / Yan Weber6-2, 6-2
2026-05-07vs Oak Creek/Jackson-Trousil W4.0TWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Suter / Lola Lott vs Amanda Frawley / Mary Jane Carter6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Meg Lohr
usually #2 Singles 55%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
3.92
Shannon Hogan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.90
Abby Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.83
Rochelle Watson
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Louise Bexley
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.80
Tiffany Webster
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Erin Lange
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Tricia Roos
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.77
Lola Lott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Leah Oliver
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.72
Jen Mulhern
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.71
Emily Suter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Maria Hasbany
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Devon Bowling
published 4
3.64
Leigh Breunig
published
3.59
Kasey Colvin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Georgina Chew
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.57
Heather Neilson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.50
Brenda Talavera
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Kate Walters
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
OLIA BOSOVIK
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Lohr + Louise Bexley7071% games+7.6% vs expected
Maria Hasbany + Lola Lott6064% games+4.3% vs expected
Erin Lange + Tricia Roos9255% games+3.5% vs expected
Tricia Roos + Louise Bexley8657% games−1.7% vs expected
Georgina Chew + Abby Thompson2844% gamesnot enough data
Maria Hasbany + Leah Oliver5156% gamesnot enough data
Kasey Colvin + Jen Mulhern3355% gamesnot enough data
Rochelle Watson + Louise Bexley404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meg Lohr
53W–14L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
4.02
Shannon Hogan
22W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Abby Thompson
14W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
Rochelle Watson
51W–22L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
Louise Bexley
37W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Tiffany Webster
20W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Erin Lange
61W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
Tricia Roos
31W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
Lola Lott
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Leah Oliver
17W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.75
Jen Mulhern
25W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Emily Suter
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Maria Hasbany
17W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Devon Bowling
12W–11L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Leigh Breunig
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.64
Kasey Colvin
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Georgina Chew
7W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.59
4
Heather Neilson
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Brenda Talavera
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Kate Walters
15W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.40
OLIA BOSOVIK
13W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.