Teams

LLW-CV-Indian Wells TG/Kouwabunpat

2022 SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Women's 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-10vs CV-/Monterey CC/ChurchWon 10
W#1 DoublesSally Sterling / Maria Crema vs Martha Church / Ann Habeger6-2, 6-1
2022-12-03vs CV-Palm Desert TC/CannonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSally Sterling / Lilyana Rinaldi vs Lisa Lucht / Janelle Washington2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-11-26vs CV-Palm Springs TC/HoffmanWon 10
W#2 DoublesAshley Matkin / Thelma Sahara vs Wanda Ramos / Celeste Armitage6-2, 6-0
2022-11-12vs CV-Palm Desert TC/CannonWon 20
W#1 DoublesSally Sterling / Maria Crema vs Shelly Johnson / Chrissy Armstrong6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Matkin / Mary Monahan vs Mistie Iseman / Julie House6-2, 6-1
2022-11-05vs CV-Palm Springs TC/HoffmanLost 01
L#2 DoublesSonja Lampasi / Meg Maloney vs Janice Campbell / Kathalena Cocker6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-29vs CV-/Monterey CC/ChurchWon 20
W#2 DoublesSonja Lampasi / Ashley Matkin vs Jane Whitney / Wendy Hawley6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMeg Maloney / Jennifer Finnell vs Leslie Daily / Susan Potter6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-22vs CV-Palm Desert TC/CannonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLorna Matthew / Sally Sterling vs Carole Myser / Donna Wrigley6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAshley Matkin / Lilyana Rinaldi vs Debra Bennett / Mistie Iseman0-6, 2-6
2022-10-15vs CV-Palm Springs TC/HoffmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Crema / Sally Sterling vs Maureen Jaramillo / Ginny Ehrlich6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Kim Kouwabunpat
published
4.12
Sally Sterling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.11
Maria Crema
published
3.74
Thelma Sahara
published
3.66
Ashley Matkin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Meg Maloney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Jennifer Finnell
published
3.59
Lorna Matthew
published
3.55
Kelly Diamond
published
3.46
Judi Marchand
published
Sonja Lampasi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Sterling + Ashley Matkin3244% gamesnot enough data
Meg Maloney + Lorna Matthew033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Kouwabunpat
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
4.36
4
Sally Sterling
125W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
4.12
Maria Crema
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
Thelma Sahara
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Ashley Matkin
91W–63L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Meg Maloney
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Jennifer Finnell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Lorna Matthew
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Kelly Diamond
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
Judi Marchand
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
Sonja Lampasi
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.