Teams

Oakwood - Blake

2025 Combo 55 & Over Women Night - Mobile · 6.5 Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-20vs Oakwood - KendallLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Ray / Jean Hernandez vs Barbara Agagan / Susan Eways3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Barnett / Sheila Mahoney vs Mary Wacker / Deanne Pollara2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Nonnenmacher / Susan Groom vs Lisa Warren / Reenie Kinney5-7, 1-6
2025-07-14vs Oakwood - KendallLost 12
L#1 DoublesJamie Lett / Jean Hernandez vs Beth Mathison / Dianne Nolan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaureen Lowe / Angele Balthrop vs Denise Hester / Susan Eways0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Groom / Jennifer Medeiros vs Reenie Kinney / Debra Presley0-6, 2-6
2025-07-09vs Oakwood - KendallLost 02
L#1 DoublesJamie Lett / Maureen Lowe vs Beth Mathison / Barbara Agagan5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Nonnenmacher / Jennifer Medeiros vs Deanne Pollara / Mary Wacker5-7, 3-6
2025-06-18vs Oakwood - KendallLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngele Balthrop / Joanne Upton vs Michele Grimes / Deanne Pollara3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJean Hernandez / Michelle Ray vs Amy Kendall / Arlene Volnoff2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathy Barnett / Sheila Mahoney vs Kathy Clark / Lisa Warren3-6, 1-6
2025-06-08vs Oakwood - KendallLost 12
L#1 DoublesJamie Lett / Theresa Perry vs Arlene Volnoff / Kathy Clark2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJean Hernandez / Michelle Ray vs Susan Eways / Mary Wacker6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Nonnenmacher / Joanne Upton vs Lisa Warren / Beth Mathison1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Jamie Lett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Kathy Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Jennifer Medeiros
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Angele Balthrop
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Susan Nonnenmacher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Theresa Perry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Sheila Mahoney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Jean Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.53
Shannon Blake
published
2.52
Tena Baine
published
2.49
Maureen Lowe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Susan Groom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Joanne Upton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Groom + Susan Nonnenmacher2440% games+3.5% vs expected
Theresa Perry + Susan Nonnenmacher3349% games−0.1% vs expected
Susan Groom + Joanne Upton01028% games−15.9% vs expected
Susan Nonnenmacher + Joanne Upton0523% gamesnot enough data
Angele Balthrop + Susan Nonnenmacher134 matchesnot enough data
Angele Balthrop + Sheila Mahoney134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Nonnenmacher + Jean Hernandez123 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Barnett + Sheila Mahoney033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jamie Lett
51W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kathy Barnett
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
Jennifer Medeiros
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Angele Balthrop
8W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
Susan Nonnenmacher
21W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Theresa Perry
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Sheila Mahoney
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Jean Hernandez
22W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
Shannon Blake
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Tena Baine
12W–40L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Maureen Lowe
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Susan Groom
7W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.29
Joanne Upton
1W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.