Teams

7-AJarvis-CHTC

2022 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-22vs 3-GLoFrese-Eno- 18+ ComboLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmber Jarvis / Colleen Starns vs Courtney Chacos / Stephanie Pucci3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Baxter / Ai-Jiuan Wu vs Leslie Jackson / Gretchen LoFrese2-6, 1-6
2022-09-15vs 2-Aoshea/STerrey-CCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Baxter / Amber Jarvis vs Irma Husain / Allison Oshea6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAi-Jiuan Wu / Colleen Starns vs Barbara Do Greene / Megan Pruette6-1, 6-0
2022-09-08vs 6-KRyan-HVCC 2.5/5.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesColleen Starns / Erin Flanagan vs Kersten Biehn / Melaine Young6-4, 6-3
2022-09-01vs 5-KGreen-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmber Jarvis / Ai-Jiuan Wu vs Che-Jung Chang / Dongbo Lu7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLaura Chaves Cerdas / Colleen Starns vs Stephanie Ross / Christy Kirk3-6, 3-6
2022-08-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmber Jarvis / Lisa Baxter vs Katie Elder / Megan Lott4-6, 4-6
2022-08-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmber Jarvis / Colleen Starns vs Kelsey Miller / Chris Lapaire6-1, 6-2
2022-08-11vs 4-JYoung-Eno-18+ 2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Baxter / Ai-Jiuan Wu vs Pamela Howell-Davis / Liz Schaller6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesColleen Starns / Laura Chaves Cerdas vs Edith Becerra / Jean Cormier3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Amber Jarvis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Lisa Baxter
published 3
3.14
Ai-Jiuan Wu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Lizzy Burch
published 3
2.85
Destiny Lopez
published 3
2.47
Colleen Starns
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.46
Jessica Alzamora
published
2.12
Laura Chaves Cerdas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Jarvis + Lisa Baxter3258% gamesnot enough data
Amber Jarvis + Colleen Starns224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amber Jarvis
92W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
3
Lisa Baxter
92W–48L career · no lines in 2022
<1%4%96%
3.23
3
Ai-Jiuan Wu
36W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
Lizzy Burch
44W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Destiny Lopez
20W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
2.5
Colleen Starns
42W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%59%41%
2.47
Jessica Alzamora
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.46
Laura Chaves Cerdas
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.