Teams

Wild Timber (Lindsay Hofmann)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 3.5 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Sandy McQueen
published
3.62
Maribel Shields
published
3.53
Ashley Hooie
published 3.5
3.43
Valentina Ichim
published
3.38
Kat Ponzio
published
3.38
Eileen Cobb
published
3.38
Lindsay Hofmann
published
3.37
Candi Harris
published 3.5
3.32
Kelly DeVries
published
3.30
Maridell Banks
published
3.28
Jamie Bak
published
3.19
Kinley Thomas
published
3.15
Anne Sepko
published 3.5
3.12
Susan Cangelosi
published
3.10
Mary Geil
published
2.80
Erin Mitchell
published
Lisa Simpson
published
Lori Mruk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valentina Ichim + Kinley Thomas3255% games+14.5% vs expected
Wilhelmine Casimir-Summers + Adriana Cifuentes5077% games+14.3% vs expected
Maribel Shields + Ashley Hooie12169% games+11.6% vs expected
Jamie Bak + Kinley Thomas7257% games+8.8% vs expected
Maridell Banks + Eileen Cobb7070% games+8.6% vs expected
Maribel Shields + Eileen Cobb4163% games+6.4% vs expected
Ashley Hooie + Sandy McQueen3357% games+6.1% vs expected
Anne Sepko + Ashley Hooie7255% games+3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandy McQueen
71W–34L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.72
Maribel Shields
113W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Ashley Hooie
119W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Valentina Ichim
53W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Kat Ponzio
27W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Eileen Cobb
63W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Lindsay Hofmann
105W–44L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Candi Harris
62W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Kelly DeVries
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Maridell Banks
90W–47L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Jamie Bak
82W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Kinley Thomas
31W–18L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Anne Sepko
34W–20L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Susan Cangelosi
34W–28L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Mary Geil
48W–27L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Wilhelmine Casimir-Summers
33W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Adriana Cifuentes
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Erin Mitchell
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Simpson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Mruk
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.