Teams

WNCG Anderson (HRC)

Combo 65 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 65's Women 6.5 Combo - Wed AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-01vs WNCP McClurkin (HRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesLoretta Arrington / TLynn Gilpin vs Marian Wood / Helen Goldberg7-5, 6-4
2025-09-17vs WNCW Page (Peachtree)Won 10
W#2 DoublesGay Anderson / TLynn Gilpin vs Alice Robbins / Christel Walter6-4, 6-4
2025-08-29vs WNCP McClurkin (HRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesGay Anderson / TLynn Gilpin vs Susan Lipski / Sandy Thompson6-3, 6-4
2025-08-27vs WNCW Page (Peachtree)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / Loretta Arrington vs Ronda Champion / Christel Walter4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65's Women 6.5 Combo - Wed AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
TLynn Gilpin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.33
Laurie Guinn
published
3.27
Dottie Mattern
published
3.21
Roberta Heinrich
published
3.18
Kristy Owens
published
3.13
Angie Rardin
published 3.5
2.90
Heather North
published
2.90
Gay Anderson
published
2.77
Debra Highsmith
published 3
2.73
Loretta Arrington
published
2.68
Barbara Weinland
published 3
Sharon Purcell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gay Anderson + Heather North5456% games+5.0% vs expected
Angie Rardin + TLynn Gilpin224 matchesnot enough data
Roberta Heinrich + Laurie Guinn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
TLynn Gilpin
286W–221L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Laurie Guinn
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Dottie Mattern
18W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Roberta Heinrich
9W–21L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Kristy Owens
16W–31L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Angie Rardin
15W–29L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Heather North
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Gay Anderson
17W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
Debra Highsmith
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
Loretta Arrington
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Barbara Weinland
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Sharon Purcell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.