Teams

GEPTA/18&overMX/6.0/Garcia/FB

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.71
Alison Krattiger
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Ernesto Landeros
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
Ernesto Tovar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Eufemia Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Gemma Ridland
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Hector Mendoza
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Irma Portillo
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Jaqueline Martinez Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 24% · published
Jassivy Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jorge Coreano
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Kara Hurd
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Kevin Woodson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Lizeth Alejandra Torres Castaneda
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Manny Casillas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roman Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tyler Hinshaw
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eufemia Garcia + Kevin Woodson7849% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Woodson + Jorge Coreano9652% gamesnot enough data
Eufemia Garcia + Jassivy Hernandez1634% gamesnot enough data
Alison Krattiger + Gemma Ridland3447% gamesnot enough data
Eufemia Garcia + Irma Portillo0535% gamesnot enough data
Hector Mendoza + Irma Portillo0536% gamesnot enough data
Roman Hernandez + Kara Hurd134 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Woodson + Hector Mendoza224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alison Krattiger
30W–54L career · 37 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Ernesto Landeros
16W–3L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ernesto Tovar
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Eufemia Garcia
81W–125L career · 32 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gemma Ridland
14W–13L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hector Mendoza
19W–52L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Irma Portillo
21W–40L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jaqueline Martinez Mendoza
35W–28L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jassivy Hernandez
55W–42L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jorge Coreano
55W–72L career · 32 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kara Hurd
10W–26L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Woodson
84W–67L career · 50 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lizeth Alejandra Torres Castaneda
23W–21L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Manny Casillas
12W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roman Hernandez
46W–36L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Hinshaw
3W–20L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.