Teams

MARIN TC 18MX9.0A

2023 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX9.0

24 players · average NTRP 4.58 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anton Stryhas
published 5.5
4.88
Lisa Everest
published
4.38
Jennifer Mills
published
4.36
Kristin Morrell
published
4.26
Chris Trepte
published 4.5
4.21
Kiran F Narsinh
published
4.20
Loren Quaglieri
published 4.5
4.18
Sugi Bernard
published
4.13
Brooke Juhl
published 4.5
3.94
Amy See
published 4.5
3.87
3.81
Carnet Williams
published 4
3.79
Robert Ahearn
published
3.68
Jason Holmes
published
3.64
John Honey
published
3.62
Thomas Chang
published
3.58
Susan Swezy
published
3.51
Emily Bell
published
Emily Birkenseer
published
Favio de Marco
published
Jeffery Birkenseer
published
Jerod Mah
published
Rachel Ogdie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carnet Williams + Rachel Ogdie3260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5.5
Anton Stryhas
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Everest
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.88
Jennifer Mills
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
4.38
Kristin Morrell
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.36
Kimberly Borah-Schulist
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Chris Trepte
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kiran F Narsinh
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
4.21
4.5
Loren Quaglieri
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.20
Sugi Bernard
20W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
4.18
4.5
Brooke Juhl
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Amy See
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.94
Michael Lustenberger
18W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Carnet Williams
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
Robert Ahearn
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Jason Holmes
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
John Honey
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Thomas Chang
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.62
Susan Swezy
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Emily Bell
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Emily Birkenseer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Favio de Marco
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeffery Birkenseer
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jerod Mah
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Ogdie
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.