Teams

The Forest Lowe

2023 LeeCharlotte Adult 40 & Over Winter Weeknight · 3.0 W Monday EVE

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-27vs LEECHAR / BrownLost 02
L#1 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Brenda Pitts vs Jane Smith / Cindy Woods2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJeri Carley / Roseann McGee vs Christy Jo Ellis / JEANNIE THWAITES2-6, 4-6
2023-03-13vs LEECHAR / BrownLost 01
L#1 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Damaris Schneider vs Elise Benkard / Susan Hoffman0-6, 6-7
2023-03-06vs Bridgetown DouglassLost 01
L#1 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Mary Lowe vs Lisa DeLauder / Sylvia Lamantia2-6, 1-6
2023-02-20vs Bridgetown DouglassLost 01
L#1 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Christina Lael vs Donna Douglass / Amy Hopperstad2-6, 4-6
2023-02-13vs LEECHAR / BrownLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristina Lael / Dorothy Waldron vs Elise Benkard / Christy Jo Ellis7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRoma Bonnin / Jeri Carley vs Wanda Bierbrauer / Cindy Woods0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Gondos / Roseann McGee vs Cathrin Matzen / JEANNIE THWAITES4-6, 4-6
2023-01-30vs Bridgetown DouglassLost 01
L#1 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Christina Lael vs Sylvia Lamantia / Sarah Catala6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-01-23vs LEECHAR / BrownLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeri Carley / Brenda Pitts vs Jane Smith / Susan Hoffman3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRoseann McGee / Roma Bonnin vs Gail Hawthorne / Cathrin Matzen6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-01-09vs Bridgetown DouglassSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFrances Higgins / Dorothy Waldron vs Donna Douglass / Amy Hopperstad3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrenda Pitts / Jeri Carley vs Sylvia Lamantia / Tonya Sammons6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Monday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Dorothy Waldron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Mary Lowe
published
2.88
Candace Schecter
published 3
2.83
Ann Difilippo
published 3
Brenda Pitts
published 3
2.72
Claudia Rands
published 3
Jeri Carley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Roma Bonnin
published
Roseann McGee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Difilippo + Mary Lowe5060% games+11.3% vs expected
Jeri Carley + Roseann McGee91050% gamesnot enough data
Dorothy Waldron + Candace Schecter134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dorothy Waldron
88W–70L career · 7 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Mary Lowe
21W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Candace Schecter
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Ann Difilippo
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Brenda Pitts
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Claudia Rands
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
2.72
Jeri Carley
32W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Roma Bonnin
18W–37L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roseann McGee
54W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.