Teams

FTA18A/HollyTree/Schlarb

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - FTA Sunday · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-27vs FTA18A/ACACSportsclub/BranhamSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJudith Lofurno / Michelle Begin vs Hope Moriarty / Jessica Bobbie4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJordan Haun vs Lauren Smith4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJean Kleis / Melanie Greene vs Tina Underwood / Kelly Lewis7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTheresa Schlarb / Taunya Haun vs Monika Franz / Lisa Mlady6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-04-13vs FTA18A/Cardinal/RoodLost 23
W#1 DoublesNaomi Kozawa / Judith Lofurno vs Andrea Murillo / Kellar Rogers6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVan Nguyen vs Britanny A ROOD4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJean Kleis / Taunya Haun vs Sara Mower / Caroline Carter3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesJordan Haun vs Chimene Evans6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBlair Brading / Lisa Littleton vs Abby Smith / Crystal Cleveland1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cybil Nielsen
published 3.5
3.15
Jeania Smith
published
3.15
Taunya Haun
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Michelle Begin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Melanie Greene
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Naomi Kozawa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Michelle Weston
published
2.90
Blair Brading
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.88
Suzy Clary
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Jean Kleis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Claudia Kornaros
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Theresa Schlarb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Van Nguyen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.81
Judith Lofurno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Lisa Littleton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jordan Haun
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Vanessa Vu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Kornaros + Van Nguyen4452% games+1.1% vs expected
Jean Kleis + Michelle Begin2346% games−2.3% vs expected
Taunya Haun + Jean Kleis3646% games−5.5% vs expected
Taunya Haun + Melanie Greene2443% games−12.7% vs expected
Suzy Clary + Lisa Littleton224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Weston + Jeania Smith224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Weston + Michelle Begin404 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Weston + Theresa Schlarb134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cybil Nielsen
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeania Smith
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
Taunya Haun
26W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Michelle Begin
27W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
Melanie Greene
14W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Naomi Kozawa
38W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.01
Michelle Weston
22W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Blair Brading
29W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Suzy Clary
12W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Jean Kleis
28W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Claudia Kornaros
57W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Theresa Schlarb
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Van Nguyen
22W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Judith Lofurno
9W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Lisa Littleton
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Jordan Haun
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Vu
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.