Teams

M2M Boss Fairies

2024 18&Over Women Night · 3.5 Night

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-15vs Deer Park, BakerWon 50
W#1 DoublesLisa Cullington / Amy Bursztyn vs Traci Stevenson / Jenna Baker6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesTanya Kotov vs Jennifer Cramer6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngela Clark / Tran Lam vs Lucretia Simone-Israel / Frances Bolitho6-3, 6-7
W#2 SinglesLavinia Barrientos vs Sharon Shaw6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKris Adams / Janeen McFarlane vs Lisa Fenimore / Lisa Reuben7-5, 6-3
2024-07-10vs Kings Park, GillenWon 32
L#1 DoublesCathy Stephan / Tran Lam vs Nicauly Schindel / Anne McConville3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLavinia Barrientos vs Lauren Bohman5-7, 5-4
W#2 DoublesMarilyn Sloan / Debbie Hung vs Amy Gillen / Melissa Scheinman6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMichelle Kraics vs Lauren Siegel6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngela Chui / Angela Clark vs Lorena Trabucco / Julia Mermelstein6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-17vs Blue Point, BarryWon 50
W#1 DoublesLisa Cullington / Amy Bursztyn vs Zsuzsa Price / Jen Goldner6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTanya Kotov vs Larissa Kravanja6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Kraics / Zuzanna Pociecha vs Tracey Barry / Jennifer Leggio6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLavinia Barrientos vs Julie Mischo6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesIrene Moshkovich / Debbie Hung vs Kathleen Kenneally / Nancy DAmato6-3, 6-4
2024-06-05vs Quogue, Ameres/VillanoWon 32
W#1 DoublesMichelle Kraics / Lisa Cullington vs Dawn Carroll / Wyndy Sloan6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTanya Kotov vs Agne Rakauskas6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDana Brun / Kelly Mason vs Anne Pawlowski / Margaret Byrnes3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJean Hao vs Meredith Little6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKathleen de RIESTHAL / Cathy Stephan vs Susan Maimon / Suzanne OConnell2-6, 3-6
2024-06-03vs Deer Park, BakerWon 32
L#1 DoublesLisa Cullington / Kelly Mason vs Jenna Baker / Traci Stevenson0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJean Hao vs Jennifer Cramer6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAngela Clark / Marilyn Sloan vs Sharon Shaw / Anne Zaret6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMichelle Kraics vs Lindsay McMahon6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesZuzanna Pociecha / Janeen McFarlane vs Lucretia Simone-Israel / Kathy Dennis6-2, 6-0
2024-05-28vs Kings Park, GillenWon 50
W#1 DoublesTanya Kotov / Lisa Cullington vs Melissa Scheinman / Joy Martinsen6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLavinia Barrientos vs Lauren Siegel6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarilyn Sloan / Kelly Mason vs Tanya Mattera / Lorena Trabucco6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJean Hao vs Stacy Darvin6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCathy Stephan / Michelle Kraics vs Caryn Gallitto / Lauren Harris6-0, 6-0
2024-05-20vs Quogue, Ameres/VillanoWon 41
W#1 DoublesLisa Cullington / Jean Hao vs Margaret Byrnes / Lynn Villano6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTanya Kotov vs Dawn Carroll6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAngela Chui / Zuzanna Pociecha vs Theresa Ameres / Jana Schmidt6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesIrene Moshkovich vs Wyndy Sloan6-4, 6-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Stephan / Janeen McFarlane vs Agne Rakauskas / Sarah Olsen6-7, 3-6
2024-05-15vs Blue Point, BarryWon 32
W#1 DoublesCathy Stephan / Jean Hao vs Gina Muratore / Tracey Barry0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTanya Kotov vs Julie Mischo6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAngela Clark / Marilyn Sloan vs Jill Block / Jacqueline Mazzarone6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLavinia Barrientos vs Larissa Kravanja6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKris Adams / Dana Brun vs Nancy DAmato / Kitty Anderson-Galvez3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5 Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1M2M Boss Fairies0829821266
2Lynbrook, Blue/Granito0829822269
3Lynbrook, Devine08291023250
4Blue Point, Barry08211840351
5Carefree, Haiduk/Montemarano08142349365
6Point Set, Siler/Sarnelli08162351350
7Long Beach, Bickar0883267440

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Tanya Kotov
usually #1 Singles 54%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 4
3.75
Lavinia Barrientos
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.65
Jean Hao
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.51
Amy Bursztyn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Michelle Kraics
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.41
Kelly Mason
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Kris Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Tran Lam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Debbie Hung
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Marilyn Sloan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Angela Clark
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Cathy Stephan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.03
Janeen McFarlane
usually #3 Doubles 27%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
2.90
Dana Brun
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Angela Chui
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Kathleen de RIESTHAL
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Irene Moshkovich
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa Cullington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Zuzanna Pociecha
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Stephan + Tanya Kotov8168% games+11.3% vs expected
Amy Bursztyn + Lisa Cullington6157% games+11.1% vs expected
Tanya Kotov + Lavinia Barrientos11263% games+9.6% vs expected
Amy Bursztyn + Marilyn Sloan134 matchesnot enough data
Marilyn Sloan + Angela Clark033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tanya Kotov
196W–88L career · 13 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
Lavinia Barrientos
80W–40L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.75
Jean Hao
22W–6L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Amy Bursztyn
63W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
Michelle Kraics
24W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.42
Kelly Mason
26W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Kris Adams
41W–66L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Tran Lam
78W–64L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Debbie Hung
23W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Marilyn Sloan
42W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Angela Clark
30W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Cathy Stephan
84W–81L career · 5 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
Janeen McFarlane
43W–18L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Dana Brun
33W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
Angela Chui
58W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
Kathleen de RIESTHAL
26W–25L career · 6 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Irene Moshkovich
16W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Cullington
48W–18L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Zuzanna Pociecha
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.