Teams

Bratton/Memphis

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 6.5 18 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-07vs Bann/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Ansel / Taylor TerBurgh vs Susana Cunningham / Lisa Evans7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrandi Tomlinson / Ashley Burns vs Morgan Pippen / Sandra Richards6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCristi Ross / Tammy Smalley vs Cheryl Body / Ann Yackel6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Lunsford/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Ansel / Taylor TerBurgh vs Natalie Souder / Kyle Denney6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAshley Burns / Krista Weber vs Katie Gronostaj / Maria Foley6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelony Bratton / Diana Roedel vs Lyndsay Gronostaj / Ashley Lunsford6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Katie Ansel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Cristi Ross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Mandy Rude
published
3.24
Melony Bratton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Missie Knight
published
3.14
Ashley Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Krista Weber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Tammy Smalley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Debbie Pacheco
published 3.5
2.75
Brandi Tomlinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Diana Roedel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Taylor TerBurgh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mandy Rude + Melony Bratton6259% games−2.6% vs expected
Melony Bratton + Cristi Ross314 matchesnot enough data
Katie Ansel + Taylor TerBurgh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Ansel
25W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Cristi Ross
26W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Mandy Rude
22W–19L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Melony Bratton
43W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Missie Knight
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Ashley Burns
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Krista Weber
28W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Tammy Smalley
41W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3.5
Debbie Pacheco
16W–15L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.91
3
Brandi Tomlinson
23W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Diana Roedel
18W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Taylor TerBurgh
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.