Teams

Eagle Landing Brink MXD 55

2025 Duval Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 55 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-02vs JaxGolf HurseyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohnny Broyles / Polly Curole vs Linda Valinho / Lyle Hursey6-3, 6-1
2025-08-28vs JaxGolf HurseyLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohnny Broyles / Polly Curole vs Andrea Mayer / Tony Sandoval3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-08-26vs JaxGolf HurseyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarshall Knight / Polly Curole vs Andrea Mayer / Tony Sandoval4-6, 4-6
2025-07-24vs JaxGolf HurseyLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Forhan / Greg Forhan vs Andrea Mayer / Tony Sandoval3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames Letson / Kendall Taylor vs Lyle Hursey / Lisa Woods3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMaureen Pelletier / Len Pfuntner vs William Lynch / Theresa Merriam6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Tim Fritz
published
3.54
Johnny Broyles
published
3.37
Polly Curole
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
PATSY REYNOLDS
published
3.14
Karen Meyer
published
3.07
Marshall Knight
published
3.01
Kendall Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Diane Forhan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Pam Fritz
published
2.79
Lilian Verville
published
2.77
Susan Brink
published
Greg Forhan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
James Letson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Len Pfuntner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maureen Pelletier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tai Pham
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Fritz
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Johnny Broyles
22W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Polly Curole
112W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
PATSY REYNOLDS
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Karen Meyer
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Marshall Knight
3W–32L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kendall Taylor
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.01
3
Diane Forhan
19W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%38%
2.96
Pam Fritz
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.91
Lilian Verville
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.79
Susan Brink
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.77
Greg Forhan
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
James Letson
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Len Pfuntner
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Pelletier
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tai Pham
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.