Teams

6.0 PTC Hoidal X18F

2023 FALL Mixed 18 & Over - CAZ · 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-16vs 6.0 Surprise Party X18FLost 03
L#1 DoublesReigh Tuazon / Penny Springer vs Kevin Reppy / VERONICA FIELDS3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSteve Springer / Carla Diaz vs Nicole Heath / Keith Buikema7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesYolanda Jackson / Steve Krupanszky vs Hayley Davis / Chris Heath4-6, 2-6
2022-12-11vs 6.0 CTC Medley X18FLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberley Hoidal / Reigh Tuazon vs Amanda Wurster / Jason Wurster3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAngee Kane-Fabela / John Fabela vs Hiliary Shurtz / Himmat Rawat3-6, 3-6
2022-12-02vs 6.0 GK Stockton X18FWon 21
W#1 DoublesPenny Springer / Steve Springer vs Jill Hicks / Matt Hicks6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJanette Hanson / Steve Krupanszky vs Maday Villa John / Sam Waters6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAngee Kane-Fabela / John Fabela vs Kaitlin Stephens-Rich / Casey Conner5-7, 6-7
2022-11-04vs 6.0 PTC Cactus Crushers X18FLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarla Diaz / Steve Krupanszky vs Shyam Colattur / Kristin Watson1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAngee Kane-Fabela / John Fabela vs Eartha Washington / Scott Zimmer6-7, 4-6
2022-10-14vs 6.0 GK Stockton X18FWon 30
W#1 DoublesYolanda Jackson / Reigh Tuazon vs Jill Hicks / Matt Hicks6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPenny Springer / Steve Springer vs Kaitlin Stephens-Rich / Jeffry Martin6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKimberley Hoidal / Steve Krupanszky vs Sam Waters / Maday Villa John6-1, 6-2
2022-10-07vs 6.0 CTC Medley X18FLost 02
L#1 DoublesPenny Springer / Steve Krupanszky vs Amanda Wurster / Jason Wurster0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesYolanda Jackson / Nelson Benjamin-Gomez vs Usani Weissinger / Norbert Weissinger4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-09-30vs 6.0 PTC Cactus Crushers X18FWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngee Kane-Fabela / John Fabela vs Sarah Sudduth / Michael Bartolotta6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYolanda Jackson / Nelson Benjamin-Gomez vs Sarah Schultz / Bobby Williams4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanette Hanson / Reigh Tuazon vs Donna Manuel / Chris Brown6-2, 6-4
2022-09-23vs 6.0 Surprise Party X18FLost 03
L#1 DoublesYolanda Jackson / Nelson Benjamin-Gomez vs Hayley Davis / Keith Buikema2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanette Hanson / Steve Krupanszky vs Moyra Steele / Billy Steele2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAngee Kane-Fabela / Reigh Tuazon vs Yuko Price / Brian Hannahs6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
16.0 Surprise Party X18F8020411143
26.0 CTC Medley X18F6220411128
36.0 PTC Cactus Crushers X18F35111328200
46.0 PTC Hoidal X18F3581634239
56.0 GK Stockton X18F0812346286

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Yolanda Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
John Fabela
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Janette Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Steve Krupanszky
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Carla Diaz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Penny Springer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.45
Kimberley Hoidal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Angee Kane-Fabela
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Nelson Benjamin-Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Reigh Tuazon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Steve Springer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angee Kane-Fabela + John Fabela52339% games+4.7% vs expected
Yolanda Jackson + Nelson Benjamin-Gomez7450% gamesnot enough data
Reigh Tuazon + Penny Springer2439% gamesnot enough data
Steve Krupanszky + Janette Hanson5156% gamesnot enough data
Steve Krupanszky + Penny Springer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yolanda Jackson
139W–104L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
John Fabela
139W–251L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
Janette Hanson
79W–72L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
Steve Krupanszky
51W–119L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Carla Diaz
26W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
2.66
Penny Springer
43W–93L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.62
Kimberley Hoidal
17W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.45
3
Angee Kane-Fabela
45W–104L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
2.38
Nelson Benjamin-Gomez
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Reigh Tuazon
35W–69L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Steve Springer
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.