Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW8.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 8.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Euna Roh
published 4
3.85
Nancy Doan
published
3.85
Kathryn Aguilar
published
3.81
Kelly Saenz
published
3.79
Shari Mcaneney
published
3.76
Judy Cummins
published
3.65
Sally McKay
published
3.56
Kristen Schaffel
published
3.52
Sarah Westphal
published
3.51
Tanya Lo
published
3.42
Nancy Korich
published
3.38
Regina Hughes
published
3.34
Julie Golinski
published
3.33
Kay Johnson
published
Latha Attari
published
Sharyn Lawrence
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Hughes + Julie Golinski11359% games+6.4% vs expected
Kristen Schaffel + Tanya Lo1440% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Schaffel + Nancy Doan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Euna Roh
22W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
Nancy Doan
19W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Kathryn Aguilar
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.85
Kelly Saenz
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.81
Shari Mcaneney
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
Judy Cummins
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
Sally McKay
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.65
Kristen Schaffel
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
Sarah Westphal
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Tanya Lo
9W–22L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Nancy Korich
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.42
Regina Hughes
36W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Julie Golinski
20W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
Kay Johnson
16W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.33
Latha Attari
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharyn Lawrence
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.