Teams

Tatyana Kansburg/Alex Quiros

WTT In-House Spring · Summer Flex League at Sand Island and WT

2 players · average NTRP 4.25 / EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings7 teams · Summer Flex League at Sand Island and WT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Debbi Lorah/Laura Sommers3232543
2Megan Slifka/Barbara McCarthy3333753
3Tatyana Kansburg/Alex Quiros2121221
4Lorise Chow/Torrie Kline2424968
5Jennifer Nelson/Erin Volutza101008
6Elaine Lawrence/Jan Wood15151062
7Emily Masters/Ashley Brown0202424

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Alejandra Quiros
published 4.5
3.71
Tatyana Kansburg
published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alejandra Quiros
77W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
4.46
4
Tatyana Kansburg
250W–152L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.