Teams

Ossman/Nashville

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Wednesday AM

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-07-09vs Rose/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesLesly Todesco / Susan Manley vs Kelly Montgomery / Lissa Vestevich7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Wednesday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Noi Sengsouk
published
Brenda Ossman
published 4
3.73
Rhonda Petrin
published
3.67
Melinda Doty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Donna Demouy
published
3.40
Sara Gibbs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Sara Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Susan Manley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Katrena Miller
published
3.29
Nancy Russell
published
3.28
Julie Lavigne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Suzanne Camping
published
3.22
Vesna Pavlovic
published
2.86
Amy Frankel Nau
published 3
2.82
Elita Shalkevich
published
2.72
Dewanda Carbine
published 3
2.71
Rebecca Gilbert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Baker + Sara Gibbs9652% games+5.2% vs expected
Katrena Miller + Nancy Russell4160% gamesnot enough data
Rhonda Petrin + Donna Demouy2350% gamesnot enough data
Noi Sengsouk + Melinda Doty404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noi Sengsouk
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Brenda Ossman
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhonda Petrin
20W–19L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Melinda Doty
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
Donna Demouy
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Sara Gibbs
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Sara Baker
24W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Susan Manley
26W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Katrena Miller
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
Nancy Russell
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Julie Lavigne
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.28
Suzanne Camping
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Vesna Pavlovic
36W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
3
Amy Frankel Nau
17W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Elita Shalkevich
20W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Dewanda Carbine
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Rebecca Gilbert
15W–27L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.