Teams

Yang

2025 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-13vs Net AssetsWon 21
W#1 SinglesNathan Chow vs Nnamaka Nwakaihe6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSean Yang vs Asa Elkins6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesRandy Lee vs Sharif Charles1-6, 4-6
2025-08-24vs DC Rally Champs 3.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesNathan Chow vs Nikkhil Dev Murthy7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesBenoit Kroely vs Ben Weaver1-6, 3-6
2025-08-24vs BreakersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesNathan Chow vs John Sluder6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesRandy Lee vs Michael Wasser4-6, 4-2
2025-08-17vs RacqueteersWon 20
W#1 SinglesNathan Chow vs Mehdy Sedaghat Payam6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSean Yang vs Taurean Branch7-5, 4-4
2025-08-07vs 3.5 TerminettersWon 20
W#1 SinglesSean Yang vs Matt Downing6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesRandy Lee vs Scott Whittaker6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-08-03vs DC Tennis Club (3.5 men)Won 30
W#1 SinglesNathan Chow vs Mitchell Miller6-4, 5-0
W#2 SinglesBenoit Kroely vs Jeffrey Marks4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSean Yang vs William Bryan6-0, 6-0
2025-08-02vs Racqueteers DC SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesBenoit Kroely vs Adnan Karimi6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesSean Yang vs Juan Martinez Guzman6-7, 3-0
2025-07-19vs Chip N ChargeLost 02
L#1 SinglesSean Yang vs Shawn Drury4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesBenoit Kroely vs Nicholas Isaac Bamman4-6, 3-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Racqueteers DC Singles01021918175
2Yang010151530247
33.5 Terminetters010121833261
4DC Rally Champs 3.5010111941280
5DC Tennis Club (3.5 men)01082243273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Nathan Chow
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Randy Lee
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.27
Benoit Kroely
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Sean Yang
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nathan Chow
13W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Randy Lee
15W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3
Benoit Kroely
96W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.27
Sean Yang
5W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.