Teams

Link

2026 Iowa Tri-Level League · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Women (East)

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-22vs DiLeoLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Wright / Avery Link vs Kay Dileo / Christine Veitzer1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaroline Rozeboom / Lulu Rozeboom vs Bethany Koch / Christine Amelon4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Golding / Karen Thinnes vs Cheryl VandeVoorde / Nancy Patrick4-6, 4-6
2026-07-15vs RathLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Wright / Lulu Rozeboom vs Alisa Steele / Maleah Hampton1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaroline Rozeboom / Julie Golding vs Hillary Johnson-Jahangir / Tiffany Williams5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Thinnes / Cheryl Patten vs Jennifer Kemmerer / Erin Langdon2-6, 6-7
2026-07-01vs DiLeoLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Wright / Avery Link vs Michele Conlon / Sara Loetscher0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Link / Cassandra Kotek vs Bethany Koch / Christine Amelon6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Thinnes / Cheryl Patten vs Cheryl VandeVoorde / Cathy Dmello2-6, 2-6
2026-06-24vs RathLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Wright / Avery Link vs Sophia Fain / Kathryn Fain6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLulu Rozeboom / Karoline Rozeboom vs Hillary Johnson-Jahangir / Tiffany Williams7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCait Klenk / Karen Thinnes vs Jennifer Kemmerer / Blair Gordon6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2026-06-17vs RathWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Wright / Avery Link vs Greta Rath / Alisa Steele7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Link / Karoline Rozeboom vs Anna Siddall / Maleah Hampton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Thinnes / Cait Klenk vs Erin Langdon / JENNIFER HEBERT4-6, 4-6
2026-06-10vs DiLeoLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Wright / Avery Link vs Kay Dileo / Michele Conlon1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Link / Karoline Rozeboom vs Laura Anderson / Christine Amelon6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Thinnes / Cait Klenk vs Andrea Heffernan / Cheryl VandeVoorde4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Women (East)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Link1531532207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Amy Link
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Cassandra Kotek
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Avery Link
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.35
Karoline Rozeboom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Lulu Rozeboom
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Cait Klenk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Julie Golding
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Cheryl Patten
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Karen Thinnes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Patten + Karen Thinnes3444% games−2.0% vs expected
Karoline Rozeboom + Amy Link134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Link + Avery Link314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Thinnes + Cait Klenk033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Link
35W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Cassandra Kotek
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4.5
Avery Link
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.69
Karoline Rozeboom
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Lulu Rozeboom
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Cait Klenk
17W–23L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Julie Golding
19W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Cheryl Patten
29W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
Karen Thinnes
31W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.