Teams

DWebb.65C-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 65 & Over · 65 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 9 9:00 AM
Whippoorwill Park
Sep 16 9:00 AM
Chapel Hill Country Club
Sep 23 9:00 AM
Hollow Rock Racquet Club
Sep 30 9:00 AM
Hope Valley Farms YMCA
Oct 7 9:00 AM
Whippoorwill Park
2026-09-02vs MPanek-HRWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeidi Blankenship / Brenda Pratt vs Joelle Romac / Kathleen Fitts6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMillie Hunter / Pamela Hobson vs Tara Russell / Kim Craig3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSally Mauriello / Barbara Howe vs Claire Bassett / Cindy Rossitch6-2, 6-3
2026-08-26vs DRoach-CHCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesDonna Holtaway / Barbara Howe vs Linda Harrison / Laura Leshin7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrenda Pratt / Heidi Blankenship vs Laurie Oakley / Sara Morgan6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTerry Friddle / Elaine Yeh vs Julie Vozella / Nancy McLaughlin6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Donna Holtaway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Heidi Blankenship
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Elaine Yeh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Sally Mauriello
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
DJ Maniace
published 3.5
3.03
Denise Heinze
published 3.5
3.00
Brenda Pratt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.00
Millie Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Janice Clayton
published
2.89
Beverly Fedewa
published 3
2.87
Pamela Hobson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Barbara Howe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Camille Blommer
published 3
2.70
Terry Friddle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Pratt + Camille Blommer4448% gamesnot enough data
Donna Holtaway + Camille Blommer5256% gamesnot enough data
Millie Hunter + Sally Mauriello2448% gamesnot enough data
Brenda Pratt + Beverly Fedewa5157% gamesnot enough data
Denise Heinze + DJ Maniace224 matchesnot enough data
Donna Holtaway + Terry Friddle224 matchesnot enough data
Millie Hunter + Terry Friddle303 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Howe + Beverly Fedewa213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Holtaway
117W–93L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.48
Heidi Blankenship
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Elaine Yeh
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Sally Mauriello
144W–151L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
DJ Maniace
101W–80L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.05
3.5
Denise Heinze
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Brenda Pratt
97W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3.5
Millie Hunter
64W–65L career · 1 line in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Janice Clayton
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Beverly Fedewa
10W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Pamela Hobson
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Barbara Howe
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Camille Blommer
73W–74L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Terry Friddle
164W–164L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.