Teams

Dinkins - Lawn and Tennis

2025 Sandhills Adult 40 & over · 4.0 Adult Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-06vs Kilpatrick - CCNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJavier Burgos / Peter Tarvis vs Sherwood Blackwood / Ryan Ciccone6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-29vs Kilpatrick - CCNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Tarvis / Javier Burgos vs Sherwood Blackwood / David Woronoff3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-15vs Kilpatrick - CCNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Saheim / Javier Burgos vs James Marino / Jonathan Richman6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-08vs Kilpatrick - CCNCWon 10
W#2 DoublesTim Boyte / Zeb Bost vs David Woronoff / Jeff Kilpatrick6-0, 7-5
2025-04-01vs Kilpatrick - CCNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Tarvis / Tim Boyte vs David Woronoff / Ryan Ciccone6-4, 6-2
2025-03-18vs Kilpatrick - CCNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Tarvis / Javier Burgos vs James Marino / Ryan Ciccone6-4, 6-3
2025-03-11vs Kilpatrick - CCNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesTim Boyte / Michael Saheim vs James Marino / David Helms6-2, 6-4
2025-03-04vs Kilpatrick - CCNCWon 20
W#1 DoublesTim Boyte / Peter Tarvis vs James Marino / Ryan Ciccone7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Dinkins / Javier Burgos vs Steve Saye / Chip Payne6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Tim Boyte
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Javier Burgos
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
A Keith Fox
published 4
3.67
Steve Dinkins
published
3.55
Carl Berk
published 4
Michael Saheim
published
Peter Tarvis
published
Todd Brandon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Boyte + Javier Burgos3246% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tim Boyte
61W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Javier Burgos
40W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
A Keith Fox
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Dinkins
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Carl Berk
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
Michael Saheim
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Tarvis
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Brandon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.