Teams

Willow Oaks (Campbell)

2025 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Men

17 players · average NTRP 3.29 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-14vs Avalon StowersWon 30
W#1 DoublesBernly Bressler / Alex Burnett vs David McKelvey / Gregory Blouch6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanny MacNelly / Steve Campbell vs Darrell Jervey / Derek Phipps6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTim Socia / George Forsythe vs Richard Stowers / Ford Sleeman1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-07vs MRTC Williams 6.5 Men ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Rosenstock / Alex Burnett vs James Bryant Gates Jr / Sheehan Walker6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeff Moehling / Edward McDermott vs William Wilkins / Eleazer Allnice6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCal Whitehead / Troy Kingsbury vs Carlos Empeno / Gabriel Walker4-6, 1-6
2025-08-30vs SCC Combo - StembridgeLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Ford / Ryan Frei vs Dan Stembridge / Michael Hyatt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Campbell / Roland Vetter vs James Collins / Jeff Brown6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCal Whitehead / Matt James vs EJ Watkins / Gregory Moore4-6, 5-7
2025-08-16vs ACAC Jones & Mulligan 6.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesIvan Mullinax / Danny MacNelly vs Anthony Forgey / Christopher Kandl6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBill Dagostino / Jeff Moehling vs Eddie Kim / Joey Townsend6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCharles Ayers / Bernly Bressler vs K C Funk / John Kosco0-6, 5-7
2025-08-02vs Mercurio Chestnut Oaks 6.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesIvan Mullinax / Brian Ford vs Robert Mercurio / Sam Cohen1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Campbell / Roland Vetter vs Andrew Arakas / Lucas Ward6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeff Moehling / Bill Dagostino vs Gary Hinson / Evan Anderson6-3, 6-1
2025-07-27vs Dominion DykesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Rosenstock / Matt Curtis vs Shane Farrell / George Drudge6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDanny MacNelly / Matt James vs Varun Mehta / Jamie OToole1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTim Socia / Ivan Mullinax vs Brian Dunn / Kevin Price6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
James Rosenstock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Roland Vetter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Danny MacNelly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Steve Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Jeff Moehling
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Ryan Frei
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Bernly Bressler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Brian Ford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Cal Whitehead
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Alex Burnett
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.97
Ivan Mullinax
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Bill Dagostino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
Edward McDermott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Troy Kingsbury
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
George Forsythe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Charles Ayers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Tim Socia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bernly Bressler + Alex Burnett4156% gamesnot enough data
Ivan Mullinax + Alex Burnett224 matchesnot enough data
Ivan Mullinax + Danny MacNelly303 matchesnot enough data
Edward McDermott + Alex Burnett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James Rosenstock
24W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Roland Vetter
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Danny MacNelly
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Steve Campbell
15W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
Jeff Moehling
15W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Ryan Frei
20W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Bernly Bressler
14W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Brian Ford
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cal Whitehead
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Alex Burnett
35W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Ivan Mullinax
32W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Bill Dagostino
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Edward McDermott
20W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Troy Kingsbury
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
George Forsythe
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Charles Ayers
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Tim Socia
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.