← Teams

MV-Harbell

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Mary Chennault
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.67
Alex Harbell
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.29
Julie Arness
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
—
Stephanie Harbell
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3
—
Craig Mcreary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
—
Roger Gwin
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 0
—
Tony Chennault
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 0
Results8 ties
2018-12-02Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRoger Gwin / Stephanie Harbell vs Richard Sohn / Susie Jansky7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTony Chennault / Karen Walker vs Zachary Wright / Kim Wright5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlex Harbell / Julie Carmena vs Alex Young / Rachel Young7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2018-11-18Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Harbell / Roger Gwin vs Sandra Ellis / Paul Stutzman6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Arness / Craig Mcreary vs Steve Sanford / Cynthia Ross-Brockett6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRich Johnson / Mary Chennault vs Sandi Martes / David Lomartire6-1, 6-2
2018-11-03Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRoger Gwin / Stephanie Harbell vs Sarah Ferrer / Kevin Jarvis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlex Harbell / Julie Arness vs Albert Hensley / Michele Sutherland6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTony Chennault / Karen Walker vs Duy Nguyen / Chanon Ogden6-3, 6-4
2018-10-27Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTony Chennault / Karen Walker vs Rick Davis / Paula Jacobson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Arness / Craig Mcreary vs Jennifer Woodard / William DelPlato6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Chennault / Rich Johnson vs Geneann Shepherd / Anthony Guzzi6-2, 6-1
2018-09-30Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRoger Gwin / Stephanie Harbell vs Paul Laurent / Alysa Rose6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCraig Mcreary / Julie Arness vs Gordon Osaka / Marianne Dwyer6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTony Chennault / Karen Walker vs Michael Adler / Laurie Sykes6-3, 7-5
2018-09-30Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRoger Gwin / Stephanie Harbell vs Brandy Horwitz / Michael Horwitz6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlex Harbell / Julie Arness vs Gabriel Weaver / Erin Prince6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTony Chennault / Karen Walker vs Kevin Meier / Patricia Board6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2018-09-22Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJulie Arness / Craig Mcreary vs Jason Fitzgerald / Elise D Harvey6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Chennault / Rich Johnson vs John Baker / Melinda Baker6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAlex Harbell / Julie Carmena vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2018-09-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRoger Gwin / Stephanie Harbell vs Stephanie Haas / Julian Miller7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTony Chennault / Karen Walker vs Katie Chong / Rob Laing6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlex Harbell / Julie Carmena vs Nina Nguyen / Michael Arellano7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Mary Chennault
106W–57L career
1%98%1%
3.75
4
Alex Harbell
127W–53L career
5%95%0%
3.67
3.5
Julie Arness
84W–57L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3
Stephanie Harbell
70W–26L career
not enough data
—
0
Craig Mcreary
45W–43L career
not enough data
—
0
Roger Gwin
45W–45L career
not enough data
—
0
Tony Chennault
37W–27L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.