Teams

CVTA SILVER

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-20vs MEA GREENLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlisa Mallinger / Amanda Kapolnek vs Victoria Koury / Alice Madden2-0
2023-07-13vs RCC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmanda Kapolnek / Jenna Prey vs Lisa Highley / Torey Kirkpatrick5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Balcerak / Nicole Winterton vs Janice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov6-4, 6-1
2023-07-06vs BRMST REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelissa Balcerak / Laurie Harris vs Jill Bouck / Carol Anderson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-05vs TTA-E BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmanda Kapolnek / Alisa Mallinger vs Debby Melvin / Deborah Zolfi3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-02vs CVTA REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmanda Kapolnek / Sally Vander Veer vs Damaris Ayuso / Mary Fitzgibbon6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-15vs LTA-P REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Balcerak / Elowyn Rich vs Kris Graham / Tanya Eisele0-6, 2-6
2023-06-08vs BTA-C BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesAmanda Kapolnek / Alisa Mallinger vs Rebekah Davis / Judy Therond5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Beth Marvel
published 3.5
Bethany Sartell
published 3.5
3.13
Michelle Karr
published
3.12
Elowyn Rich
published
3.01
Sally Vander Veer
published
2.97
Amanda Kapolnek
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.88
Melissa Balcerak
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Alisa Mallinger
published 3
Jenna Prey
published
Maryl Bergeson
published
Susan Hoy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elowyn Rich + Melissa Balcerak1542% games+2.2% vs expected
Amanda Kapolnek + Alisa Mallinger134 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Balcerak + Sally Vander Veer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Marvel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Bethany Sartell
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Karr
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Elowyn Rich
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
3.12
Sally Vander Veer
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Amanda Kapolnek
40W–46L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.97
3
Melissa Balcerak
35W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Alisa Mallinger
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jenna Prey
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maryl Bergeson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Hoy
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.