Teams

Midtown/Oppenheimer

2025 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Day · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.60 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-23vs HeronBay/BanhamWon 10
W#1 DoublesLorena Esclair / Samantha Heymann vs Magally Bruce / Odyssa Billings1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesClaudia Low vs Melissa Clements5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-05-19vs Wrc/ BarrazaLost 02
L#1 DoublesSamantha Heymann / Lorena Esclair vs Monica Clinton / Jona Moreno4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesClaudia Low / Adriana Perez vs Yamila Fernandez Barraza / Lucila Valenzuela1-6, 6-7
2025-04-28vs Wrc/ BarrazaLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlejandra Jaramillo / Lorena Esclair vs Silvana Luft / Jona Moreno2-6, 3-6
2025-04-21vs HeronBay/BanhamLost 01
L#1 SinglesClaudia Low vs Anabella Bhatti2-6, 2-6
2025-04-07vs Wrc/ BarrazaWon 10
W#1 DoublesLorena Esclair / Samantha Heymann vs Silvana Luft / Monica Clinton6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.57
Alane Taporowski
published 3
2.41
Tiffany Spence
published
2.38
Julieta Escudero
published
2.37
Maria Pia Escamilla
published
2.35
2.34
Lorena Esclair
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.32
Zareen Khimani
published
2.31
Yiannik Bennett
published
2.30
Samantha Heymann
published
2.25
Claudia Low
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.23
Geraldina Bidegain
published
2.16
Adriana Perez
published 2.5
2.14
Alejandra Jaramillo
published 2.5
2.12
Kim Oppenheimer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Geraldina Bidegain + Julieta Escudero7260% games+11.9% vs expected
Adriana Perez + Alejandra Jaramillo6256% games+3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alane Taporowski
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Tiffany Spence
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.41
Julieta Escudero
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
Maria Pia Escamilla
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
Lucienne Skalski de Campos
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35
Patricia Ballesteros
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Lorena Esclair
17W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
Zareen Khimani
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
Yiannik Bennett
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
Samantha Heymann
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Claudia Low
24W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Geraldina Bidegain
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Adriana Perez
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Alejandra Jaramillo
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
Kim Oppenheimer
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.