Teams

Stewart - BHSC Double Deucers

2025 Charlottesville Mixed 40 & Over · Charlottesville Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-26vs Bayliss - ACAC MixersLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnita McGinty / Matthew Lucas vs Derek Frazier / Lauren Thraves6-7, 5-7
W#1 DoublesKatherine Morris / Rob Cross vs Patti Pate / Nolan Wages7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Burns / Diane Burns vs Jill Lord / J Harrison Keevil6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTodd Hochrein / Courtney Heyward vs Taylor Cole / Joan Mower6-0, 6-3
2025-07-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Eric Overman vs Beverly Sweeney / Matt Jones6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-29vs Barger- Farmington - Mixed SignalsLost 01
L#3 DoublesChris Stewart / Anita McGinty vs Rob Sievers / Penny Ward4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Matthew Morris vs Jill Lord / Rob Sievers6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
David Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Matthew Reidenbach
published
3.47
Todd Hochrein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
JP Hesford
published 3.5
3.39
Shannon Henderson
published
3.36
Katherine Morris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Heidi Binko
published 3.5
3.22
Courtney Heyward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Merrily Main D'Arpino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.21
Polly Hunter
published
3.11
Anita McGinty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Esther Cho
published 3
2.99
Diane Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Karen Overman
published
Rob Cross
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Burns + Diane Burns224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Burns
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Matthew Reidenbach
7W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Todd Hochrein
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
JP Hesford
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.40
Shannon Henderson
27W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Katherine Morris
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Heidi Binko
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Courtney Heyward
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Merrily Main D'Arpino
151W–107L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Polly Hunter
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Anita McGinty
73W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Esther Cho
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Diane Burns
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Karen Overman
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Rob Cross
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.