Teams

GTC SILVER

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs CP NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesCarlie Jacobsen / Brianna Laffey vs Belinda Nelson / Erica Nollen6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJill Kroeker / Kristin Barry vs Kate Deeny / Kristin Loudis6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAli Elkins vs Catherine MacCormick6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSarajane Goodfellow / Rebecca Kern vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-28vs GPTC GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrianna Laffey / Holly Luebker vs Lani Reichardt / Annie McIntosh2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanessa Jacobsen / Carlie Jacobsen vs Katherine Barston / Lisa Barnhill6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSarajane Goodfellow / Sarah Grimmer vs Anna Gallagher / Stephanie Cook6-4, 7-6
2024-05-14vs CACM TEALWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanessa Jacobsen / Carlie Jacobsen vs Alecxis Naviaux / Sasha Parker6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKristin Barry / Jill Kroeker vs Julie Boes / Jessica Pohl7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAli Elkins vs Elizabeth Kirkpatrick7-5, 7-5
2024-05-07vs CACM PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolly Luebker / Brianna Laffey vs JD Herman / Jennifer Thomas6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAli Elkins vs Kelsey Berlin1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarajane Goodfellow / Sarah Grimmer vs Lissa Moon / Amy Springer4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-30vs DTC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrianna Laffey / Holly Luebker vs Elaine Yang / Lisa OConnor4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJanessa Jacobsen / Carlie Jacobsen vs Laura James / Lara Merriken1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJill Kroeker vs Renae Kyle3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSarajane Goodfellow / Sarah Grimmer vs Janice Jensen / Cynthia Mix6-2, 7-6
2024-04-23vs CM GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Grimmer / Jill Kroeker vs Theress Pidick / Brooke O'Drobinak3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJanessa Jacobsen / Brianna Laffey vs Brooke Tippin / Amy Newman7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristin Barry / Holly Luebker vs Lesley Brophy / Kass Schwappach2-6, 3-6
2024-04-16vs SKY BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesSarah Grimmer / Jill Kroeker vs Jane Gonnella / Tori Hutchens2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrianna Laffey / Holly Luebker vs Brooke Burgamy / Karen Calle7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesCarlie Jacobsen vs Jennifer Urbonas1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Kern / Sarajane Goodfellow vs Andrea Sykora / Therese Aleinikoff6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Ali Elkins
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.73
Carlie Jacobsen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.72
Holly Luebker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Janessa Jacobsen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Sarah Grimmer
published
3.66
Brianna Laffey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Rebecca Kern
published
3.62
Sarajane Goodfellow
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.47
Kristin Barry
published
3.34
Jill Kroeker
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Samantha Hanfelder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Barry + Jill Kroeker1444% games+7.0% vs expected
Brianna Laffey + Holly Luebker7853% games+1.8% vs expected
Janessa Jacobsen + Carlie Jacobsen202349% games−0.2% vs expected
Sarajane Goodfellow + Sarah Grimmer3348% games−0.4% vs expected
Janessa Jacobsen + Holly Luebker191153% games−2.1% vs expected
Janessa Jacobsen + Brianna Laffey10852% games−6.9% vs expected
Sarajane Goodfellow + Holly Luebker4254% gamesnot enough data
Carlie Jacobsen + Brianna Laffey3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ali Elkins
51W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Carlie Jacobsen
34W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.73
4
Holly Luebker
58W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Janessa Jacobsen
52W–57L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Sarah Grimmer
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Brianna Laffey
49W–44L career · 6 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
Rebecca Kern
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Sarajane Goodfellow
39W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
Kristin Barry
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Jill Kroeker
27W–49L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
Samantha Hanfelder
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.