Teams

UPTA40M/Townsend/Kroc

2026 UPTA Mixed 40 & Over - USTA · 40+ Mixed - 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-07vs UPTA40M/Graeber/Hwy14Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKurt Schumacher / Erin Carroll vs Benjamin Adams / Krista Furman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKirby Mitchell / Beth Burris vs Sean Teaster / Blair Zeimetz4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRandall Maxey / Kathryn Stewart vs Patrick Hill / Hannah Martin2-6, 0-5
2026-06-30vs UPTA40M/Shuler/BrookstoneWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Englebardt / Catherine Mesa vs Karthik Ramaratnam / Cara Hamilton6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael Randolph / Beth Burris vs Quinn Camak / Thomas Diggins6-2, 6-3
2026-06-16vs UPTA (A) 3.0M 40 & Over (Woodall)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMeg Scoopmire / Kurt Schumacher vs Kristi King-Brock / Michael Woodall3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Burris / Kirby Mitchell vs Chris Fennell / Leah Winton3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Carey / Eric Englebardt vs Steven Weinbaum / Paige Botts6-7, 1-6
2026-06-09vs UPTA40M/Zinkovich/RiversideWon 30
W#1 DoublesKurt Schumacher / Erin Carroll vs Fred Dodson / Cristina Torres6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Hoffman / Meg Scoopmire vs William Harclerode / Sandra Shillington-Lopez6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Randolph / Kathryn Stewart vs John Norton / Lucy Austin6-2, 7-5
2026-06-03vs UPTA40M/Shuler/BrookstoneWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Randolph / Beth Burris vs Greg Brock / Kelley Golden2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMark Ahrenholz / Catherine Mesa vs Ryan Camak / Quinn Camak6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRandall Maxey / Erin Carroll vs Thomas Diggins / Trish Scott6-4, 6-0
2026-06-02vs UPTA40M/Graeber/Hwy14Won 21
W#1 DoublesEric Englebardt / Meg Scoopmire vs Patrick Hill / Gina Pelino4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDrew Nelson / Catherine Mesa vs Benjamin Adams / Krista Furman0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMark Ahrenholz / Mara Townsend vs Eugene Epps / Sandy Shaw6-2, 6-0
2026-05-12vs UPTA (A) 3.0M 40 & Over (Woodall)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKurt Schumacher / Meg Scoopmire vs TRINA NEGRI / Chris Troup0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Ahrenholz / Mara Townsend vs Kevin Moran / Julie Gibson6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDrew Nelson / Christina Carey vs Chris Fennell / Leah Winton3-6, 3-6
2026-05-05vs UPTA40M/Zinkovich/RiversideLost 03
L#1 DoublesErin Carroll / Mark Ahrenholz vs Karen Scott / Joe Morris6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMara Townsend / Michael Hoffman vs Sandra Shillington-Lopez / Terry Smith6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Burris / Eric Englebardt vs Barbara Stewart Zinkovich / William Harclerode6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 40+ Mixed - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA (A) 3.0M 40 & Over (Woodall)7120412165
2UPTA40M/Graeber/Hwy146217718182
3UPTA40M/Townsend/Kroc44121227209
4UPTA40M/Zinkovich/Riverside3581636256
5UPTA40M/Shuler/Brookstone0832142259

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Eric Englebardt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Mara Townsend
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Meg Scoopmire
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Mark Ahrenholz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Christina Carey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Catherine Mesa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Kirby Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Kurt Schumacher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Randall Maxey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Michael Randolph
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.42
Beth Burris
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.38
Drew Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Englebardt + Beth Burris314 matchesnot enough data
Mara Townsend + Mark Ahrenholz314 matchesnot enough data
Beth Burris + Randall Maxey044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Eric Englebardt
13W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
Mara Townsend
32W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Meg Scoopmire
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.81
Mark Ahrenholz
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Christina Carey
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Catherine Mesa
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Kirby Mitchell
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
Kurt Schumacher
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Randall Maxey
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.63
Michael Randolph
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Beth Burris
6W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.42
3
Drew Nelson
10W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.