Teams

DWatson (Queens)

2025 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 7.5 Men - Mon PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-13vs JWolf (WSRC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJason Olszewski / Konstantin Archakov vs Jamie Wolf / Adam Dawson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Moubarak / David Watson vs Kevin Conway / Dhruv Bhatt1-6, 1-6
2025-09-22vs AHunt (Matthews)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJason Olszewski / Joseph Moubarak vs Jeff Morgan / Krishna Swain4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShailendra Chauhan / Mark Krasniewski vs Edward Scholl / Randy Loman3-6, 6-7
2025-09-15vs JRitter (Weddington)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMark Krasniewski / Derek Farmer vs Eric O'Bryan / Joseph Dichak2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKonstantin Archakov / Joseph Moubarak vs Jeremy Ritter / Frank Grindle4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-09-08vs JWolf (WSRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJason Olszewski / David Watson vs George Pawlush / Bradley Holcman3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKyle Johnson / Joseph Moubarak vs BART AUSTIN / Peter Sofarelli3-6, 1-6
2025-09-01vs RPietrykowski (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Olszewski / Derek Farmer vs Kyle Harding / Derek Norman2-6, 1-6
2025-08-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesJason Olszewski / Mark Krasniewski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-18vs PKartes/RBombien (Mountainbrook)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKyle Johnson / Joseph Moubarak vs Patrick Blandford / Rudy Bombien4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMark Krasniewski / Jason Olszewski vs Ben Senn / Heyward Bouknight4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 7.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Jason Olszewski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Konstantin Archakov
published
3.49
Joseph Moubarak
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.38
Mark Krasniewski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Anthony Dedoes
published 3.5
3.26
Sunil Mehta
published
Shailendra Chauhan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Olszewski + Joseph Moubarak2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jason Olszewski
14W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Konstantin Archakov
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Joseph Moubarak
14W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Mark Krasniewski
23W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Anthony Dedoes
39W–24L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Sunil Mehta
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Shailendra Chauhan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.