Teams

LCTA18/Billings/Dunes West

2022 USTA 18 & Over Spring · 18 & over Women 3.0 - Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & over Women 3.0 - Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amber Hutchinson
published 3.5
Brittany Hutchinson
published 3.5
3.12
Denise Barsness
published 3.5
2.94
Mary Nickerson
published
2.93
Patricia Pretorius
published
Elizabeth Thorne
published 3
2.73
Trudy Billings
published
2.63
Deborah Mahoney
published 3
2.52
Teresa Hildebrand
published
2.50
Donna Condon
published 3
Allison Cordle
published 2.5
Linda Carlson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Thorne + Denise Barsness4351% games−3.6% vs expected
Donna Condon + Teresa Hildebrand1444% games−6.7% vs expected
Patricia Pretorius + Teresa Hildebrand6550% games−10.6% vs expected
Patricia Pretorius + Elizabeth Thorne2540% games−14.5% vs expected
Patricia Pretorius + Trudy Billings1641% games−17.1% vs expected
Mary Nickerson + Teresa Hildebrand134 matchesnot enough data
Trudy Billings + Elizabeth Thorne213 matchesnot enough data
Denise Barsness + Teresa Hildebrand123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amber Hutchinson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Brittany Hutchinson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Denise Barsness
29W–51L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
Mary Nickerson
32W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
Patricia Pretorius
47W–45L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Elizabeth Thorne
33W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Trudy Billings
28W–62L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Deborah Mahoney
16W–23L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
2.63
Teresa Hildebrand
34W–50L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Donna Condon
39W–68L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
2.50
2.5
Allison Cordle
12W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Carlson
17W–54L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.